Abstract

BackgroundThe cases of donation after brain death followed by circulatory death (DBCD) and donation after cardiac death (DCD) have been increased year by year in China. Further research is needed to understand in the outcomes and risk factors of delayed graft function (DGF) in order to minimize the risk of DGF and ameliorate its potential impact on long-term outcomes. This study was to explore the differences in outcomes between DBCD and DCD transplant and the main risk factors for DGF in DBCD.MethodsRetrospective analysis of the clinical data of 367donations after citizens’ death kidney transplant procedures (donors and recipients) between July 2012 and August 2015 at our center.ResultsDuring the study period, the donation success rate was 25.3%. 164 cases of DBCD and 35 cases of DCD had been implemented and 367 kidneys were transplanted. The incidence of DGF in DBCD group were significantly lower than that of DCD group (12.0% vs. 27.0%, p = 0.002). The 1-year percent freedom from acute rejection (AR) was significantly higher in DBCD group compared with it of DCD group (94% vs. 82%, p = 0.036). Multivariate logistic regression analysis of the kidney transplants revealed that the high risk factors for DGF after renal transplantation in DBCD were history of hypertension (Odds Ratio [OR] = 5.88, 95% CI: 1.90 to 18.2, p = 0.002), low blood pressure (BP < 80 mmHg) (OR = 4.86, 95% CI: 1.58 to 14.9, p = 0.006) and serum creatinine of donor (OR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.16, p = 0.003) before donation.ConclusionsThe outcomes of DBCD could be better than DCD in DGF and AR. The main risk factors for DGF in DBCD kidney transplants are donors with a history of hypertension, low blood pressure, and serum creatinine of donor before donation.

Highlights

  • The cases of donation after brain death followed by circulatory death (DBCD) and donation after cardiac death (DCD) have been increased year by year in China

  • A comparison of donors and recipients characteristics between DBCD patients and DCD patients is displayed in Tables 1 and 2

  • Donors in DBCD group had higher craniocerebral injury rate for death cause (67.1% vs. 28.6%, p < 0.001) and BMI of recipients was a little higher in DBCD group compare it of DCD group (20.7 ± 3.2 vs. 19.8 ± 3.3, p = 0.029)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The cases of donation after brain death followed by circulatory death (DBCD) and donation after cardiac death (DCD) have been increased year by year in China. This study was to explore the differences in outcomes between DBCD and DCD transplant and the main risk factors for DGF in DBCD. Donation after cardiac death (DCD) and donation after brain death (DBD) are two processes for organ donation. Transplant technology and experiences with DCD and DBD resources are highly advanced, and the transplantation outcomes of both organ resources processes are well explored [1]. Xue et al BMC Health Services Research (2017) 17:250 deceased donations, which responded to brain death not being legally recognized in China [4]. Additional recent studies of clinical outcomes have shown that pediatric DBCD kidney donation for transplant is feasible [5]. In 2012 and 2014, Professors Huang and Sun published China DBCD-related policies regarding the implementation of standards and specifications in The Lancet [3, 6]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.