Abstract

BackgroundWe sought to determine whether socio-economic status (SES) is an independent predictor of outcome following total knee (TKR) and hip (THR) replacement in Australians.MethodsIn this prospective cohort study, we included patients undergoing TKR and THR in a public hospital in whom baseline and 12-month follow-up data were available. SES was determined using the Australian Bureau of Statistics ‘Index of Relative Advantage and Disadvantage’. Other independent variables included patients’ demographics, comorbidities and procedure-related variables. Outcome measures were the International Knee Society Score and Harris Hip Score pain and function subscales, and the Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) physical and mental component scores.ResultsAmong 1,016 patients undergoing TKR and 835 patients undergoing THR, in multiple regression analysis, SES score was not independently associated with pain and functional outcomes. Female sex, older age, being a non-English speaker, higher body mass index and presence of comorbidities were associated with greater post-operative pain and poorer functional outcomes following arthroplasty. Better baseline function, physical and mental health, and lower baseline level of pain were associated with better outcomes at 12 months. In univariate analysis, for TKR, the improvement in SF-12 mental health score post arthroplasty was greater in patients of lower SES (3.8 ± 12.9 versus 1.5 ± 12.2, p = 0.008), with a statistically significant inverse association between SES score and post-operative SF-12 mental health score in linear regression analysis (coefficient−0.28, 95% CI: −0.52 to −0.04, p = 0.02).ConclusionsWhen adjustments are made for other covariates, SES is not an independent predictor of pain and functional outcome following large joint arthroplasty in Australian patients. However, relative to baseline, patients in lower socioeconomic groups are likely to have greater mental health benefits with TKR than more privileged patients. Large joint arthroplasty should be made accessible to patients of all SES.

Highlights

  • We sought to determine whether socio-economic status (SES) is an independent predictor of outcome following total knee (TKR) and hip (THR) replacement in Australians

  • For patients who underwent staged bilateral joint replacement the second procedure was included in the analysis

  • Knee arthroplasty analyses Characteristics of the 1,016 patients who underwent TKR are summarized in Tables 1 and 2

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We sought to determine whether socio-economic status (SES) is an independent predictor of outcome following total knee (TKR) and hip (THR) replacement in Australians. Despite technical advances in orthopaedic surgery, there remain many patient-related factors that influence the outcome of large joint arthroplasty [4,5,6,7,8]. Previous studies have indicated that lower socioeconomic status (SES) may be associated with worse outcomes post. Due to differences in socio-economic fabric, ethnic composition, health care systems and cultural expectations, the relative importance of SES as a predictor of outcome post TKR and THR may differ among nations. Hospital-based services, including elective surgical procedures such as arthroplasty, are free of charge to patients. We sought to determine the association between SES and outcomes in Australian patients undergoing TKR or THR in a specialized ‘public hospital’ care setting

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call