Abstract

Undoubtedly, there is a lag in the scholarships on performance outcomes of collaboration aimed at improving the system management and responsiveness to socio-economic issues in local government. Whilst most scholarships on collaborative governance in LED focuses on what we do (processes), some others research addresses the outputs in terms of the goods and services produced from the activities as well as the social outcomes. Very little discourse on collaboration addresses collaborative outcomes in LED. Put simply, we are acquainted with what collaborative actors do, but we know very little about the impact of collaboration on the system management and responsiveness to socio-economic issues within municipalities. Now the question is how do we know what to measure? The dearth in scholarship on how to assess collaborative outcomes in LED provide an impetus to present this paper as it helps to address the knowledge gap on LED and collaboration. The paper aims to present some innovative indicators which can be used to assess, monitor and review collaborative performance in LED, with special focus on the processes and outcomes of the collaboration. Using secondary sources, the paper argues the desirability and constraints of assessing performance outcomes in collaborative governance of development pathways in local municipalities. Moreover, the paper presents some criteria for selecting effective indicators used in measuring outcomes performance of collaboration. A synopsis of major determinants of effective outcomes in collaboration for LED is presented in the paper. Finally, the paper presents proposed innovative quantitative and qualitative indicators which can be used to assess, monitor and review collaborative performance in LED in local municipalities.

Highlights

  • Developing and maintaining collaborative environment requires iterative process of performance assessment and improvement

  • This paper conceptualises Performance Management Systems (PMSs) with special focus on www.techniumscience.com performance indicators as assessment tools to measure, monitor and control performance of public policy and strategy aimed at improving system management and responsiveness to socioeconomic issues in local government

  • The paper argues the desirability of assessing performance outcomes in collaborative governance of development pathways in local municipalities

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Developing and maintaining collaborative environment requires iterative process of performance assessment and improvement. Indicator should be capable of adaptable for use in a wide range of scales, wherever possible and be subject to continues review for the purpose of adaptation (Ehler, 2003) Minimum number of indicators: Reasonability in terms of the numbers of indicator used in the assessment Availability of data: This is one of the essential criteria used to determine a suitable indicator fit for performance management in LED collaborations As per this requirement, an indicator is regarded suitable for the purpose in question if there are available data for the indicator in the phenomenon Economy: The cost of measuring the indicator should be commensurate with its worth.

Proposed generic outcomes indicators
Description of the proposed generic outcome indicator frameworks
Proposed generic outcomes indicators for measuring collaboration in LED
Objective
1: To improve accountability of LED stakeholders
1: To improve accountability among role-players
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call