Abstract

Abstract Background Respiratory insufficiency with the need for mechanical ventilation (MV) is one of the most common indications for admission to intensive care units. However, little is known about the clinical outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infraction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) who require mechanical ventilation (MV). The aim of this study was to identify the characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes associated with the provision of MV in this specific high-risk population. Methods Patients with CS complicating AMI and multivessel coronary artery disease from the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial were included. We explored clinical outcome within 30 days in patients not requiring MV, those with MV on admission, and those in whom MV was initiated within the first day after admission. Results Among 683 randomized patients included in the analysis, 17.4% received no MV, 59.7% were ventilated at admission and 22.8% received MV within or after the first day after admission. Patients requiring MV were younger, more frequently non-smokers, had higher body mass indices, presented more often with clinical signs of impaired organ perfusion including worse renal function, higher burden of coronary artery disease, were more likely to have experienced resuscitation within 24h before admission, had worse left ventricular function, and presented more often with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. The primary endpoint of all-cause death or need for renal replacement therapy occurred in 21.8% of patients without MV, in 53.3% of patients with MV at admission (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 6.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.17–11.47, p=0.002, compared to patients without) and 65.4% of patients with MV initiated within the first day after admission (aOR 8.09 95% CI 4.32–15.16, p<0.001, compared to patients without). Factors independently associated with the provision of MV on admission included higher body weight, resuscitation within 24h before admission, elevated heart rate and evidence of triple vessel disease. Conclusions Requiring MV in patients with CS complicating AMI is common and independently associated with mortality after adjusting for covariates. Patients with delayed MV initiation appear to be at higher risk of adverse outcomes. Further research is necessary to identify the optimal timing of MV in this high-risk population. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – EU funding. Main funding source(s): Swiss National Foundation

Highlights

  • Little is known about clinical outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infraction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) requiring mechanical ventilation (MV)

  • The primary endpoint of death at 30 days occurred in 21.0% of non-ventilated patients, in 49.6% of ventilated patients on admissionnat=inl1ad1t9ioinn 61.5%Aodnfm=pi4sa0sti8ioennts veDnatyil1ataefndte=rw1A5itd6hminiss1iodnay ap-fvtearlue admission (Figure 2, Table 3)

  • The primary endpoint was higher among patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) (29.1%) and specially among those receiving non-invasive ventilation (NIV) before IMV (66.7%). In this secondary analysis of the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial, we investigated the outcomes associated with respiratory failure in patients with CS and AMI and observed three novel findings

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Little is known about clinical outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infraction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) requiring mechanical ventilation (MV). Current clinical management of respiratory failure in CS is largely based on expert opinion, preclinical data or small clinical series, and most commonly includes invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) [6,7]. Alternatives such as non-invasive ventilation (NIV) are frequently used in acute pulmonary edema in patients without shock, but its use and effects in CS are less well established [6,8]. Given the paucity of available data, we sought to explore the association between MV timing and strategy among patients with CS from the CULPRIT-SHOCK (Culprit Lesion Only PCI versus Multivessel PCI in Cardiogenic Shock) randomized clinical trial

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.