Abstract
BackgroundSeveral modifications of the Kimura procedure for congenital duodenal obstruction (CDO) have been reported, however, their effects on the outcomes show conflicting results.MethodsWe compared the CDO outcomes following the Kimura procedure with and without post-anastomosis jejunostomy feeding tube (JFT).ResultsA total of 52 CDO neonates were involved (JFT: 13 males and 2 females vs. non-JFT: 14 males and 23 females, p = 0.0019). Time to full oral feeding was significantly earlier in the JFT than non-JFT group (14 [interquartile range (IQR), 12–15] vs. 17 [IQR, 14–22.5] days; p = 0.04). Duration of parenteral nutrition given to infants with CDO after surgery was significantly shorter in the JFT than non-JFT group (12 [IQR, 10–15] vs. 17 [IQR, 13–23] days; p = 0.031). Moreover, enteral feeding was significantly earlier in the JFT than non-JFT group (2 [IQR, 1–3.5] vs. 5 [IQR, 4–6] days; p = < 0.0001). However, the length of stay following surgery was not significantly different between groups (16 [IQR, 14–22] vs. 20 [IQR, 17–28] days; p = 0.22). Also, overall patient survival did not significantly differ between JFT (66.7%) and non-JFT patients (59.5%) (p = 0.61).ConclusionJejunostomy feeding tube shows a beneficial effect on the time to full oral feeding, duration of parenteral nutrition and early enteral feeding in neonates with congenital duodenal obstruction after Kimura procedure.
Highlights
Several modifications of the Kimura procedure for congenital duodenal obstruction (CDO) have been reported, their effects on the outcomes show conflicting results
This study investigated the comparison of CDO outcomes following Kimura procedure with (JFT group) and without jejunostomy feeding tube (JFT)
We are able to show the beneficial effect of JFT in neonates with CDO after the Kimura procedure regarding time to full oral feeding and duration of parenteral nutrition
Summary
Several modifications of the Kimura procedure for congenital duodenal obstruction (CDO) have been reported, their effects on the outcomes show conflicting results. Congenital duodenal obstruction (CDO) is the most common cause of intestinal obstruction in neonates [1]. There are several methods for treatment of CDO, such as transmesolic side-to-side duodenojejunostomy and direct duodenoduodenostomy [6, 7]. In 1977, Kimura introduced the diamond-shaped side-to-side duodenoduodenostomy with better outcomes for neonates with CDO. These good outcomes were followed by similar findings of other groups [6]. The Kimura procedure is considered the most preferred surgery for CDO treatment [7]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.