Outcomes after Robotic-assisted Pyeloplasty in Patients Presenting with Pain Versus Nonpain Presenting Symptoms

Abstract

ObjectiveTo assess the impact of presenting symptom or incidental finding on symptomatic and radiographic outcomes after robotic-assisted pyeloplasty (RAP). MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the records of 143 patients at our institution who received pyeloplasty from 2001-2017. Patients without both pre- and postoperative radiographic data were excluded. Patients were grouped by primary presenting symptom into either pain at presentation (pain) or nonpain primary presenting symptom, including incidental findings (nonpain). Primary outcomes were persistence of postoperative symptoms and improvement in diuretic renogram half-times. ResultsThe study inclusion criteria was met by 105 patients. Pain was the most common presenting symptom (70.0%), followed by incidental finding (10.5%), infection (7.6%), hematuria (4.8%), hypertension (2.8%), elevated creatinine (2.8%), and nausea (1.0%). Patients with nonpain presentations were significantly more likely to have postoperative symptoms (P = .04), and less likely to improve on diuretic renogram (P = .03). Incidental presentation was found to be associated with greater likelihood of persistent postoperative symptoms compared with other presentations (36.3% vs 8.5%, P = .02). ConclusionUreteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) patients presenting with pain, experience better symptom and radiographic improvement following RAP compared with patients presenting without pain. Incidental UPJO was the most common nonpain presentation and is associated with less symptomatic and radiographic benefit after RAP. These findings will help reconstructive urologists counsel patients with UPJO regarding outcomes of RAP.