Abstract

Outcome predictability effects in associative learning paradigms describe better learning about outcomes with a history of greater predictability in a similar but unrelated task compared with outcomes with a history of unpredictability. Inspired by the similarities between this phenomenon and the effect of uncontrollability in learned helplessness paradigms, here, we investigate whether learning about unpredictability decreases outcome-specific motivation to learn. We used a modified version of the allergy task, in which participants first observe the foods eaten by a fictitious patient, followed by allergic reactions that he subsequently suffers, some of which are perfectly predictable and others unpredictable. We then implemented an active learning method in a second task in which participants could only learn about either the previously predictable or unpredictable outcomes on each trial. At the beginning of each trial, participants had to decide whether they wanted to learn about one outcome category or the other. Participants at the beginning of the second task chose to learn about the previously predictable outcomes first and to learn about the previously unpredictable outcomes in later trials. This showed that unpredictability affects future motivation to learn in other circumstances. Interestingly, we did not find any sign of outcome predictability effect at the end of the second phase, suggesting that participants compensate for biased outcome sampling when making overt choices in ways that they may not when learning about both outcome categories simultaneously.

Highlights

  • Outcome predictability effects in associative learning paradigms describe better learning about outcomes with a history of greater predictability in a similar but unrelated task compared with outcomes with a history of unpredictability

  • The outcome predictability (OP) effect refers to the tendency to learn better about an outcome that has a history of predictability than about an outcome with a history of unpredictability, even if both are encountered in new situations where all outcomes are predictable

  • Learning in an initial phase establishes a bias that is observed in subsequent learning and behavior. They differ in terms of generalizability—learned helplessness (LH) appears to transfer to very different tasks that involve new learning materials, whereas the OP effect involves learning about the same outcome in two different situations—in both cases, initial learning results in a relative deficit in later learning and performance

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Outcome predictability effects in associative learning paradigms describe better learning about outcomes with a history of greater predictability in a similar but unrelated task compared with outcomes with a history of unpredictability. Participants at the beginning of the second task chose to learn about the previously predictable outcomes first and to learn about the previously unpredictable outcomes in later trials. Even if these allergic reactions are fully predictable, the learner would learn better to predict skin itchiness than stomach bloating or cramps.. Learning in an initial phase establishes a bias that is observed in subsequent learning and behavior They differ in terms of generalizability—LH appears to transfer to very different tasks that involve new learning materials, whereas the OP effect involves learning about the same outcome in two different situations—in both cases, initial learning results in a relative deficit in later learning and performance. Participants “fail” to make correct predictions of an outcome in the first situation of OP effect protocols

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.