Outcome of salvage procedures for recurrent oral and oropharyngeal cancer

Abstract

Despite advances in the primary treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancer, many patients develop local or regional recurrence, or both, and when radiotherapy has already been used, operation provides the best chance of salvage for these patients. We have looked at the outcomes of salvage procedures in a single unit, including improved survival, morbidity, and treatment-related quality of life. Patients treated with salvage procedures were identified from a prospectively-completed database. Overall and disease-free survival were analysed using Kaplan–Meier curves and logrank tests. Functional, social, and emotional outcomes were assessed using the University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaires. Twenty-nine patients were identified, of whom 24 had free flap reconstructions, and their estimated mean overall survival was 25 months (95% CI 20.4 to 29.2). Disease-free survival was significantly worse in patients with stage IV recurrences or in whom resection margins were close or invaded. Permanent gastrostomy was required in 15/29 patients, and four/29 needed a permanent tracheostomy. Answers to questionnaires showed that a large proportion of patients had considerable problems with speech, chewing, swallowing, and appearance. The decision on whether to treat recurrent head and neck cancer is a balance between improving survival and poor functional outcomes. The extent of disease and whether clear surgical margins can be achieved should be considered when treatment is recommended.