Abstract
The study was conducted to evaluate whether routine induction of labour at 41-42 weeks of gestation has an increased risk for operative delivery, maternal or fetal complication compared with spontaneously initiated labour of similar gestation. A case-control study design was used; main outcome measures were caesarean section rate, instrumental delivery and fetal outcome. There was no significant difference in caesarean section rates 36(18·0%) in the induction group, compared with 28(13·8%) in parturient spontaneously initiating labour { P =0·24 odds ratio 95% CI 1·37 (0·78:2·43)}. Instrumental interventions were comparable in the two groups (5·5% and 4·0%). A subgroup analysis of nulliparous women was also not statistically different. Other than higher rates of admission into the neonatal unit in the induction group, fetal outcomes were similar. In conclusion, a routine induction of labour for prolonged pregnancy is safe, having no significant increase in caesarean section or fetal complications. The policy is advocated especially in developing countries, in view of the uncertainty of further prolongation of pregnancy beyond 42 completed weeks.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
