Outcome of osteofibrous dysplasia-like versus classic adamantinoma of long bones: a single-institution experience

Abstract

BackgroundThe clinical and molecular characteristics of osteofibrous dysplasia (OFD)-like adamantinoma (AD) differ from those of classic AD. Most reports about OFD-like AD are case reports or small case series. More cases from different centers are still warranted.MethodsThe orthopedic oncology database of our institution was searched to identify patients with AD. The cases of OFD-like and classic AD of the long bones were retrospectively analyzed. Between December 1999 and August 2016, 23 patients were treated for AD, comprising seven with OFD-like AD and 16 with classic AD. The outcomes were compared between AD subtypes.ResultsIn the OFD-like AD group, four lesions were treated with extensive curettage, while three were treated with wide resection. The median follow-up duration in the OFD-like AD group was 66 months (range 43–131 months). At the end of follow-up, there was only one case of local recurrence (LR) in the OFD-like AD group, giving a LR rate of 14.3% (1/7). No distant metastasis or progression to classic AD was detected in the OFD-like AD group. In the classic AD group, the treatments were below-the-knee amputation in one patient with extensive tibial and fibular lesions, curettage with a bone graft in one patient who was diagnosed with OFD based on a core needle biopsy, hemi-cortical excision and reconstruction in two patients, and segmental resection and reconstruction in 12 patients. At the end of follow-up, there were three cases of LR in the classic AD group, giving a LR rate of 18.8% (3/16); two patients developed lung metastasis after LR and died of the disease at 88 and 126 months after the first surgery in our hospital, respectively. The classic AD group had a metastatic rate of 12.5% (2/16), a final limb salvage rate of 75%, and estimated 5- and 10-year survival rates of 88.9% and 77.1%, respectively.ConclusionsOFD-like AD has a better outcome than classic AD. For OFD-like AD, extensive curettage is suggested if the tumor extent allows. For classic AD, aggressive resection with wide margins is essential to achieve local control. A long-term follow-up is necessary due to the possibility of late complications.