Abstract

5027 Background: Intensity modulated pelvic radiation therapy (IM-PRT) is receiving increasing attention in gynecology. Numerous investigators have shown that IM-PRT reduces the volume of normal tissues irradiated compared to conventional pelvic RT. Recent studies have noted less toxicity in pts receiving IM-PRT. No data, however, exist regarding tumor control using IM-PRT. We present our experience using IM-PRT in stage I-II cervical cancer. Methods: Between 2/00 and 2/03, 34 stage I-II cervical cancer pts received IM-PRT. 21pts (12 IB, 9 IIA-IIB) with an intact uterus underwent IM-PRT (20 received weekly cisplatin) followed by brachytherapy, and in 6, simple hysterectomy. 13 stage I pts underwent surgery and received IM-PRT due to adverse features (lymphatic invasion, tumor >4 cm, positive nodes). 6 also received chemotherapy and 2 brachytherapy. On a contrast-enhanced CT scan, a clinical target volume was contoured consisting of the upper vagina, parametria, uterus (if present), presacral and pelvic lymph nodes, and was expanded by 1 cm creating a planning target volume (PTV). IM-PRT plans were generated using inverse planning. Pts were followed with physical exams, cytology, and CT scans. Late toxicity was graded using the RTOG/EORTC scale. Results: IM-PRT plans were highly conformal, with excellent PTV coverage and considerable sparing of the small bowel, bladder and rectum. At a median follow-up of 26.4 months, 5 pts (15%) have recurred, for a 3-year actuarial disease-free survival of 82%. All 5 recurred in extra-pelvic sites. One pt (2.9%) recurred in the pelvis, for a 3-year actuarial pelvic control (PC) of 95%. This pt had stage IIB disease. The 3-year PC of pts with an intact uterus and those treated adjuvantly were 91% and 100%. No pt developed grade ≥ 2 gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary (GU) sequelae (2 had grade 1 GI and 1 grade 1 GU toxicity). Conclusions: Stage I-II cervical cancer pts treated with IM-PRT have an excellent tumor control and low rate of toxicity. These results represent the first outcome report of gynecology pts treated with IM-PRT. Larger numbers and longer follow-up are needed to confirm these encouraging results. Author Disclosure Employment or Leadership Consultant or Advisory Stock Ownership Honoraria Research Funding Expert Testimony Other Remuneration Varian, Inc.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.