Abstract
IntroductionThe purpose of this randomized clinical trial was to evaluate healing after endodontic microsurgery (EMS) using mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) versus EndoSequence root repair material (RRM; Brasseler, Savannah, GA) as root-end filling materials. MethodsTwo hundred forty-three teeth with persistent or recurrent apical periodontitis were randomly assigned to either the MTA or RRM group. EMS was performed, and follow-up visits with clinical and radiographic investigation were scheduled at 6, 12, and 24 months with follow-up cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) imaging after 12 months. ResultsOne hundred twenty teeth with an average follow-up of 15 months were evaluated. The overall success rate was 93.3% for periapical (PA) evaluation and 85% for CBCT evaluation. The RRM group exhibited 92% and 84% success rates as assessed on PA and CBCT imaging, respectively. The MTA group exhibited 94.7% and 86% success rates as assessed on PA and CBCT imaging, respectively. No significant difference was observed between the 2 groups. Microsurgical classification, root canal filling quality, root-end filling material depth, and root fracture were found to be significant outcome predictors. ConclusionsEMS is a predictable procedure with successful outcome both 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional radiographic evaluation when RRM or MTA was used as the root-end filling material.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
