Abstract

IntroductionThere is no technique of facial nerve reconstruction that guarantees facial function recovery up to grade III. ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of different facial nerve reconstruction techniques. MethodsFacial nerve reconstruction was performed in 22 patients (facial nerve interpositional graft in 11 patients and hypoglossal-facial nerve transfer in another 11 patients). All patients had facial function House-Brackmann (HB) grade VI, either caused by trauma or after resection of a tumor. All patients were submitted to a primary nerve reconstruction except 7 patients, where late reconstruction was performed two weeks to four months after the initial surgery. The follow-up period was at least two years. ResultsFor facial nerve interpositional graft technique, we achieved facial function HB grade III in eight patients and grade IV in three patients. Synkinesis was found in eight patients, and facial contracture with synkinesis was found in two patients. In regards to hypoglossal-facial nerve transfer using different modifications, we achieved facial function HB grade III in nine patients and grade IV in two patients. Facial contracture, synkinesis and tongue atrophy were found in three patients, and synkinesis was found in five patients. However, those who had primary direct facial-hypoglossal end-to-side anastomosis showed the best result without any neurological deficit. ConclusionAmong various reanimation techniques, when indicated, direct end-to-side facial-hypoglossal anastomosis through epineural suturing is the most effective technique with excellent outcomes for facial reanimation and preservation of tongue movement, particularly when performed as a primary technique.

Highlights

  • There are different surgical techniques for facial nerve reconstruction

  • We present our results of facial function in a group of patients who developed facial paralysis due to different causes, along with their long term outcomes, using different techniques of nerve reconstruction, including the latest end-side facial hypoglossal nerve anastomosis

  • In the remaining seven cases, the facial nerve reconstruction was performed as a secondary procedure after the stabilization of the patient’s general condition; the waiting period ranging from a two-week to a four-month interval after the facial paralysis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There are different surgical techniques for facial nerve reconstruction. Ideal repair consists of direct nerve repair, but sometimes a cable nerve graft is needed if a tension-free anastomosis cannot be achieved without a nerve graft. Several modifications have since been reported, including ‘‘split’’ XII---VII transfer, in which 30% of the hypoglossal nerve is divided and secured to the lower division of the facial nerve.[3] In 2000, May et al described the VII---XII jump graft This involves end-to-side neurorrhaphy using a donor cable graft.[4] In 1997, Atlas and Lowinger described a new modification in which the facial nerve was mobilized from the second genu and reflected inferiorly for direct anastomosis to the hypoglossal nerve.[5] We present our results of facial function in a group of patients who developed facial paralysis due to different causes, along with their long term outcomes, using different techniques of nerve reconstruction, including the latest end-side facial hypoglossal nerve anastomosis

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call