Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy of two surgical methods used for the treatment of acute arteriovenous fistula (AVF) thrombosis. Twenty two out of twenty five patients that were admitted at the Clinic for vascular surgery in Sarajevo received successful surgical treatment for the salvage of acutely thromboses AVF from 2007-2009. They were included in retrospective, descriptive clinical study. Based on the type of surgical procedures performed, 22 patients were divided into two groups. The first group included 10 patients and they had successful thrombectomy of thromboses AVF while 12 patients in second group underwent de novo creation of AVF using blood vessels already exploited for construction of thromboses AVF. Patency rate of salvaged AVF in analyzed groups was compared one month and 6 months after intervention. In the postoperative follow up there was no statistically significant difference in patency rate of salvaged AVF between analyzed groups after one month, (80% vs 100%, Fisher exact test value =2,520, p= 0.195). Patency rate of salvaged AVF after six months of the follow up was significantly better in group that received de novo construction of AVF when compared to thrombectomy group (25% vs. 91%, Fisher exact test value = 1,062, p=0.002). De novo construction of AVF in case of acutely thrombosed AVF offered better patency rate of salvaged AVF when compared to surgical thrombectomy in the follow up period of six months.
Highlights
Interventional radiology has become increasingly more present in the management of acute thrombosis of vascular access, conventional surgical treatment plays significant role in its treatment in many hospitals
Surgical thrombectomy may present itself as challenging procedure in terms of ability to remove occluding thrombus completely and that is the very reason why some authors make decision to create new vascular access ( )
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of two surgical methods in salvage of thrombosed arteriovenous fistula (AVF) thrombectomy of AVF with Fogarty catheter versus newly created AVF from the blood vessels that were used for the construction of mature and functional AVF until it failed due to acute thrombosis
Summary
Interventional radiology has become increasingly more present in the management of acute thrombosis of vascular access (arteriovenous fistula), conventional surgical treatment plays significant role in its treatment in many hospitals. Surgical thrombectomy of recently thrombosed arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is one method for AVF salvage but its successful outcome is significantly jeopardized if it is performed hours after occlusion ( ). Surgical thrombectomy may present itself as challenging procedure in terms of ability to remove occluding thrombus completely and that is the very reason why some authors make decision to create new vascular access ( ). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of two surgical methods in salvage of thrombosed AVF thrombectomy of AVF with Fogarty catheter versus newly created AVF (de novo AVF) from the blood vessels that were used for the construction of mature and functional AVF until it failed due to acute thrombosis
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.