Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare outcomes between basiliximab and low-dose r-ATG in living donor kidney transplantation recipients with low immunological risk. Patients in the low-dose r-ATG group received 1.5 mg/kg of r-ATG for 3 days (total 4.5 mg/kg). Graft survival, patient survival, acute rejection, de novo donor specific antibody (DSA), estimated glomerular filtration rate (e-GFR) changes, and infection status were compared. Among 268 patients, 37 received r-ATG, and 231 received basiliximab. There was no noticeable difference in the graft failure rate (r-ATG vs. basiliximab: 2.7% vs. 4.8%) or rejection (51.4% vs. 45.9%). de novo DSA was more frequent in the r-ATG group (11.4% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.017). e-GFR changes did not differ noticeably between groups. Although most infections showed no noticeable differences between groups, more patients in the r-ATG group had cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigenemia and serum polyomavirus (BK virus) (73.0% vs. 51.9%, p = 0.032 in CMV; 37.8% vs. 15.6%, p = 0.002 in BK), which did not aggravate graft failure. Living donor kidney transplantation patients who received low-dose r-ATG and patients who received basiliximab showed comparable outcomes in terms of graft survival, function, and overall infections. Although CMV antigenemia, BK viremia were more frequent in the r-ATG group, those factors didn’t change the graft outcomes.

Highlights

  • Immunological rejection is known to increase the risk of graft loss after kidney transplantation (KT) [1]

  • Basiliximab is often used for immunologically low-risk patients, and r-ATG can be used for high-risk patients

  • Our study found no noticeable differences in the graft survival, five-year patient survival, acute rejection rate, or renal function between the low dose r-ATG group and the basiliximab group

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Immunological rejection is known to increase the risk of graft loss after kidney transplantation (KT) [1]. R-ATG is known to have a higher immunosuppressive effect than basiliximab. Induction immunosuppressant agents such as basiliximab (Simulect®, Novartis Pharmaceuticals), an interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibody (IL-2 RA) and rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (r-ATG, Thymoglobulin®, Sanofi) were used to reduce early acute rejection. It has a higher risk of enabling infection [2]. The relative risks of acute adverse reaction and subsequent infection are commonly compared when selecting an induction agent. The choice of induction agent and dosing is still debatable

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call