Abstract

To determine the impact of temporary vascular occlusion on patient outcome after surgery for renal trauma, we reviewed the records of 30 patients managed since 1977 whose injuries represented 17% of a total of 181 injuries in 175 patients. Reconstruction was judged to be adequate in 25 patients, while the remaining 5 underwent immediate nephrectomy. Compared with patients whose renal injuries did not require temporary occlusion, these 30 were more likely to have renovascular trauma, shock at presentation and higher transfusion requirements. Postoperatively, of 20 patients renal imaging (9) and radionuclide scanning (11) demonstrated preservation of significant renal parenchyma or function in 18 (90%). Although complications were more common in patients whose renal injuries required temporary vascular occlusion, only 2 were related to the renal injury or its method of repair (urinary extravasation in 1 patient and azotemia in 1 with bilateral injury).Temporary vascular occlusion can be performed expeditiously and safely, and may have an important role in preserving renal function. Our results support the routine use of early vascular control and the selective use of temporary vascular occlusion in renal injuries requiring exploration.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call