Abstract
Aims We undertook this prospective observational study to investigate the long-term prognosis after balloon angioplasty (PTCA), coronary stenting (CS) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods and results A total number of 1038 patients with PTCA ( n = 499), CS ( n = 294) or CABG ( n = 245) were followed-up over a mean time of 6.4 ± 1.8 years. Forty-two patients (4.0%) were lost to follow-up, leaving a study population of 996 subjects who were available for analyses. The primary and secondary endpoints were mortality and major adverse cardiac events (MACE), respectively. Overall death rate was 19.3%. Age, pulse pressure, smoking, diabetes, serum LDL cholesterol levels and left ventricular ejection fraction rather than the intervention type independently predicted mortality. The incidence rate of MACE was 53.7%. Compared to PTCA patients, CS patients had lower (hazard ratio 0.693; 95% confidence interval 0.514–0.793) and CABG patients the lowest risk of MACE (hazard ratio 0.343; 95% confidence interval 0.261–0.450). Further risk factors for MACE were serum LDL cholesterol levels, three-vessel coronary artery disease and left ventricular ejection fraction of < 30%. Conclusion Long-term mortality does not differ among patients who received percutaneous interventions or CABG. Major adverse cardiac events occur more often in patients with previous percutaneous interventions, whereby CS has advantage over PTCA.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.