Abstract
Effective task switching is supported by the inhibition of the just executed task, so that potential interference from previously executed tasks is adaptively counteracted. This inhibitory mechanism, named Backward Inhibition (BI), has been inferred from the finding that switching back to a recently executed task (A-B-A task sequence) is harder than switching back to a less recently executed task (C-B-A task sequence). Despite the fact that BI effects do impact performance on everyday life activities, up to now it is still not clear whether the BI represents an amodal and material-independent process or whether it interacts with the task material. To address this issue, a group of individuals with Williams syndrome (WS) characterized by specific difficulties in maintaining and processing visuo-spatial, but not verbal, information, and a mental age- and gender-matched group of typically developing (TD) children were subjected to three task-switching experiments requiring verbal or visuo-spatial material to be processed. Results showed that individuals with WS exhibited a normal BI effect during verbal task-switching, but a clear deficit during visuo-spatial task-switching. Overall, our findings demonstrating that the BI is a material-specific process have important implications for theoretical models of cognitive control and its architecture.
Highlights
IntroductionThe capacity to inhibit thoughts and actions that are no longer relevant (but that were relevant right earlier) is crucial for everyday functioning
The capacity to inhibit thoughts and actions that are no longer relevant is crucial for everyday functioning
Post hoc comparisons on the significant sequence effect revealed that Backward Inhibition (BI) and switch cost effects were present in both groups, as indicated by the slower reaction times (RTs) in the ABA versus CBA sequence and slower RTs on switch (ABA or CBA) compared to repetition trials (AAA) (Fig 2)
Summary
The capacity to inhibit thoughts and actions that are no longer relevant (but that were relevant right earlier) is crucial for everyday functioning. Responding to a new situation or task requires the deactivation of mindsets that have been adopted in the recent past in favor of currently relevant mindsets [1]. In a changing environment, the overall success depends on the ability to complete a task while resisting the tendency to skip to another task for no other reason than its presence in the field of view [2]. Flexibility is as important as stability in directing goal-related behavior. PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0142613 November 13, 2015
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.