Abstract
Restoration ecologists have local‐ to global‐scale ambitions in a policy framework of sustainable development goals and reversing biodiversity loss. Emphasis is given to environmental alteration, typically considering land degradation and climate change. Other related environmental drivers, such as pollution, receive less attention. Here we emphasize that terrestrial restoration discourse needs to consider tropospheric ozone (O3) pollution. O3's pervasive influence on plants and other ecosystem components provides for the possibility of consequences at community and ecosystem levels. The precursor chemicals that lead to O3 formation are increasing, precipitously so in rapidly industrializing regions of the world. Yet, a review of critical restoration guidance and journals suggests that because O3 is out of sight, it remains out of mind. Based on a narrative cross‐discipline literature review, we examine: (1) How O3 could affect the achievement of restoration goals and (2) How restoration interventions could feedback on tropospheric O3. Evidence, currently limited, suggests that O3 could impair the achievement of restoration goals to as great an extent as other drivers, but, in general, we lack direct quantification. Restoration interventions (e.g. tree planting) that may be considered successful can actually exacerbate O3 pollution with negative consequences for food security and human health. These wide‐ranging effects, across multiple goals, mean that O3 is not out of scope for restoration science, policy, and practice. In detailing a strategic ozone‐aware restoration agenda, we suggest how restoration science and policy can quantify O3's influence, while outlining steps practitioners can take to adapt to/mitigate the impacts of O3 pollution.
Highlights
National and international restoration targets are designed to tackle integrated socio-ecological issues, encompassed by the sustainable development goal (SDG) agenda
In trying to reach targets of resilient and sustainable systems, restoration ecologists, policy makers and practitioners often focus on threats such as climate change, but are aware of air pollution issues, especially nitrogen deposition (e.g. Bobbink et al 2010; McPhee et al 2015)
We contend that the demonstrated void suggests policy makers, restoration ecologists and practitioners are unaware of O3’s cascade of consequences for plants and other ecosystem components, and any implications this has for the achievement of restoration goals (Figure 1)
Summary
National and international restoration targets are designed to tackle integrated socio-ecological issues, encompassed by the sustainable development goal (SDG) agenda. Air pollution, biodiversity, climate change, nitrogen deposition, restoration targets, tropospheric ozone, UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration Restoration science, policy and practice need to account for impacts of tropospheric ozone (O3) pollution on the attainment of restoration goals.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.