Abstract

Filtering strategies enable social media users to remove undesired content from their feeds, potentially creating homophilic environments. Although previous studies have addressed the individual-level factors and content features that influence these decisions, few have solely focused on users’ perceptions. Accordingly, this study applies social exchange theory to understand how users socially construct the process of unfriending. Based on 30 in-depth interviews with young Spaniards, we identify a widespread pattern of rejection over repetitive, opinion-challenging, and offensive posts, which we conceptualize as out-of-place content, a type of social media stimulus that hinders substantive online exchanges and challenges users’ understanding of social reality and individual values. This study contributes to current literature on unfriending by suggesting that filtering strategies are implemented gradually when posts overwhelm users’ tolerance threshold. Our findings also suggest that their deployment hinges on the closeness of the relationship between peers and social commitments formed in specific platforms. Future research is needed to assess to what extent the patterns identified in our interviews are present in the overall population.

Highlights

  • Drawing upon social exchange theory (Homans 1958, 1961), this study aims to fill this gap in the literature by examining how users manage online exchanges of undesired content, how this content is comprised, and subsequent reactions towards it

  • Extant research has suggested the integral role of social media in people’s lives and, a large majority of our participants acknowledged spending more than three hours per day on these sites

  • The digital space of social media enables users to engage in myriad online exchanges

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Social media platforms enable users to access a wide range of content and opinions published by people from all walks of life. Evidence shows that users frequently encounter posts that they do not find interesting, disagree with, or strongly reject (Barnidge 2017; Beam et al 2018; Cardenal et al 2019). These posts may lead them to implement filtering strategies, by which they will homogenize their public sphere (John and Gal 2018) and prevent further exposure to similar unpalatable content (Zhu et al 2017)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call