Abstract

IntroductionThis study explores why resuscitation is withheld when mobile emergency medical team arrive at the scene of a cardiac arrest.MethodsWe conducted a prospective, observational study in pre hospital emergency services. We included adults' patients, with a suspicion of non-traumatic cardiac arrest (CA) in an out of hospital environment, who received or not cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) by our mobile emergency medical service teams. An analytic study was conducted in order to identify independent factors that could influence the decision to resuscitate OHCA.ResultsDuring study, 228 patients were enrolled, the mean age was 64 +/- 14 years and 59% were men. Eighteen patients (8%) received bystander CPR by witnesses. The median time elapsed to arrive at the scene was 13 [8-25] min. The median “noflow” was 22 [10-34] min. The resuscitation decision was taken by the mobile EMS staff for 106 patients (46.5%). For other patients, the decision not to resuscitate was motivated solely by the finding of a confirmed state of death in an elderly patient (p = 0.045). The predictive decision factor for resuscitation was the no flow time less than 18.5 min, Odds Ratio adjusted with 95% confidence interval to: 1.38 (1.24 - 3.55) (p <0.001). Overall out of hospital survival rate was 17% of resuscitated patients.ConclusionThe decision to resuscitate a cardiac arrest outside of the hospital depends more on the “no flow” time than on the presumed etiologies.

Highlights

  • When cardiac arrest (CA) occurs there is sudden cessation of circulation to the brain and other vital organs

  • There were 236 patients eligible for inclusion; 8 patients were excluded because of the diagnosis established by the mobile emergency medical service (EMS) doctors is not a cardiac arrest

  • Ventricular fibrillation (VF) and ventricular tachycardia without a pulse (VT), frequently, are the rhythms found in persons with witnessed CA, as a result of which it is extremely important that both cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and defibrillation should be undertaken at an early stage [9,10]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

When cardiac arrest (CA) occurs there is sudden cessation of circulation to the brain and other vital organs. Data indicate that CPR is only initiated or continued by mobile emergency medical service (EMS) in approximately 28,000 cases. This suggests that in more than 50%of cardiac arrests, resuscitation is withheld by mobile EMS [2]. Circumstances exist where attempting resuscitation is inappropriate. This includes un-survivable injuries or clear evidence of death (e.g. rigor mortis, post mortem staining). Resuscitation is withheld by mobile EMS teams when there is no prospect of success. This study aimed to determine the reasons for resuscitating or not an OHCA by the mobile EMS teams when they arrived at the scene

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call