Abstract

SummaryBackgroundAlthough mortality due to COVID-19 is, for the most part, robustly tracked, its indirect effect at the population level through lockdown, lifestyle changes, and reorganisation of health-care systems has not been evaluated. We aimed to assess the incidence and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in an urban region during the pandemic, compared with non-pandemic periods.MethodsWe did a population-based, observational study using data for non-traumatic OHCA (N=30 768), systematically collected since May 15, 2011, in Paris and its suburbs, France, using the Paris Fire Brigade database, together with in-hospital data. We evaluated OHCA incidence and outcomes over a 6-week period during the pandemic in adult inhabitants of the study area.FindingsComparing the 521 OHCAs of the pandemic period (March 16 to April 26, 2020) to the mean of the 3052 total of the same weeks in the non-pandemic period (weeks 12–17, 2012–19), the maximum weekly OHCA incidence increased from 13·42 (95% CI 12·77–14·07) to 26·64 (25·72–27·53) per million inhabitants (p<0·0001), before returning to normal in the final weeks of the pandemic period. Although patient demographics did not change substantially during the pandemic compared with the non-pandemic period (mean age 69·7 years [SD 17] vs 68·5 [18], 334 males [64·4%] vs 1826 [59·9%]), there was a higher rate of OHCA at home (460 [90·2%] vs 2336 [76·8%]; p<0·0001), less bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (239 [47·8%] vs 1165 [63·9%]; p<0·0001) and shockable rhythm (46 [9·2%] vs 472 [19·1%]; p<0·0001), and longer delays to intervention (median 10·4 min [IQR 8·4–13·8] vs 9·4 min [7·9–12·6]; p<0·0001). The proportion of patients who had an OHCA and were admitted alive decreased from 22·8% to 12·8% (p<0·0001) in the pandemic period. After adjustment for potential confounders, the pandemic period remained significantly associated with lower survival rate at hospital admission (odds ratio 0·36, 95% CI 0·24–0·52; p<0·0001). COVID-19 infection, confirmed or suspected, accounted for approximately a third of the increase in OHCA incidence during the pandemic.InterpretationA transient two-times increase in OHCA incidence, coupled with a reduction in survival, was observed during the specified time period of the pandemic when compared with the equivalent time period in previous years with no pandemic. Although this result might be partly related to COVID-19 infections, indirect effects associated with lockdown and adjustment of health-care services to the pandemic are probable. Therefore, these factors should be taken into account when considering mortality data and public health strategies.FundingThe French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM)

Highlights

  • Added value of this study Our study showed the course of of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) incidence and outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic in Paris and its suburbs (6·8 million inhabitants), from the beginning of the surge in infections and lockdown, until the decrease in its incidence

  • In Paris and its suburbs (6·8 millions inhabitants), patients with OHCA are managed by the Paris emergency medical services (EMS), a two-tiered response system, coordinated via a unique dispatch centre:[12,13] (1) a basic life support tier provided by 197 basic life support teams from the Paris Fire Brigade (Brigade des Sapeurs Pompiers de Paris), who can apply an automatic external defibrillator, and (2) an advanced cardiac life support function provided by ambulance teams with a physician, a nurse, and a paramedic (Paris Fire Brigade or Service d’Aide Médicale Urgente)

  • Data from the past 9 years of the Paris-SDEC registry indicate that the incidence of OHCA has been stable over time in Paris and its suburbs, which is in contrast with the major increase observed during the pandemic period

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Beyond the direct mortality caused by COVID-19, there are growing concerns regarding the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on health systems.[5,6] Lockdown and movement restrictions imposed in several countries, as well as the fear of contamination in hospitals, could have led to a reluctance by patients to call emergency medical services (EMS) or present to emergency departments, resulting in suboptimal health care and delays. Deferable routine medical activity, including scheduled hospitalisations and consultations, were cancelled to focus on care for patients with COVID-19, and avoid unnecessary exposure of stable patients to the risk of contamination at the hospital. These indirect effects of the COVID-19 pan­ demic could have detrimental effects on population health. A few media reports have sugg­ ested an increase

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call