Abstract
This paper introduces a process model that identifies limitations in media’s corporate governance role to explain why and how not all corporate wrongdoing is subjected to media disapproval. Media disapproval involves three stages: detection, interpretation, and response. Corporate wrongdoing that falls within media’s perceptual field can be selected for reporting. Past social performance that signals an altruistic orientation accumulates moral capital that can temper media interpretation of observed corporate wrongdoing. Media employ a cost–reward analysis to guide their response, state ownership increasing the opportunity cost of disapproval, which could damage favorable media relations with the government. Empirical results of analyses of a panel data sample of 3,202 Chinese publicly listed firms between 2012 and 2017 provides support for this process model of media disapproval of corporate wrongdoing.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.