Abstract
This case study describes the challenges faced by A Journal of the Plague Year: An Archive of COVID-19 ( JOTPY) in achieving metadata consistency despite the project’s success at capturing rich metadata for its nearly 10,000 objects. The problem of inconsistency was amplified by JOTPY’s model of shared authority and its status as a global curatorial consortium with dozens of partners. JOTPY was able to address this issue of metadata consistency by employing, training, and tasking hourly student curators called the Curation Crew. The Curation Crew underwent rigorous curatorial training and was, despite their lack of experience in archival curation, able to achieve an impressive level of curatorial consistency. They are now recognized as JOTPY’s greatest quality control assets and have even begun to, themselves, contribute to the development of best practices. In addition to their data-cleaning tasks, the Curation Crew also directs its labors toward recording their own thoughts and feelings by generating several submissions per week. As metadata consistency improves, the Curation Crew’s labor is being redirected toward a wider range of tasks such as oral history transcription and targeted collecting.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Collections: A Journal for Museum and Archives Professionals
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.