Abstract

Purpose. Improvement of the results of treatment of patients with locally advanced and metastatic gastric cancer. Material and methods. From the 2010–2014 we performed 30 surgeries using techniques HICT. Among patients there were 17 men and 13 women. The median of age was 50 years. Locally advanced gastric cancer (T4a-T4b) was observed in 22 cases, including 4 patients in the emergency immunocytochemical study with peritoneal lavage detected cancer-free (Cyt +) cells in the abdominal cavity. The group of patients with metastatic gastric cancer accounted for 8 patients. Narrow carcinomatosis (P1) was 4 cases, carcinomatosis (P2-P3) — 4. Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy in the study group was not carried out. In the control group No 1 (n = 51) performed surgery alone, without additional anticancer therapy. In the control group No 2 (n = 66), a combined treatment (surgery + chemotherapy). Results. Follow-up median was 25 months. Overall 1-year survival rate for all three groups was 55%, 39% and 52%, respectively. Median survival in the intervention group versus 21.4 months in the 8 and 12 months, respectively. The most effective HICT is shown for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. In the study group, median overall survival was 29 months. The survival rate of 1-, 2-, 3-year-old was equal to 68%, 61% and 42%. In the first control group, 1-year survival of 45%. None of the patients did not survive 2 years. In the second control group, one-year survival rate was 60%, 2-year survival is not. Results of treatment of metastatic gastric cancer proved to be more modest. In the main group the median survival was 10 months, compared with 6 and 7 months of the two control groups. There were no statistically significant differences. Conclusions. 1. Availability of limited dissemination, free cancer cells in the abdominal cavity, as well as a massive defeat of serous membrane of the stomach can be seen as indications for HICT in gastric cancer. 2. In gastric cancer with carcinomatosis P2-P3 effectiveness of HICT is questionable, even with the full cytoreduction.

Highlights

  • Проблема перитонеального канцероматоза при раке желудка Согласно общепринятым положениям, основными путями метастазирования рака желудка являются лимфогенный, гематогенный и имплантационный

  • The group of patients with metastatic gastric cancer accounted for 8 patients

  • A. Safety and preliminary results of perioperative chemotherapy and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for high-risk gastric cancer patients

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Проблема перитонеального канцероматоза при раке желудка Согласно общепринятым положениям, основными путями метастазирования рака желудка являются лимфогенный, гематогенный и имплантационный. ОПЫТ КОМБИНИРОВАННОГО ЛЕЧЕНИЯ БОЛЬНЫХ МЕСТНО-РАСПРОСТРАНЕННЫМ И ДИССЕМИНИРОВАННЫМ РАКОМ ЖЕЛУДКА С ИСПОЛЬЗОВАНИЕМ МЕТОДИКИ ГИПЕРТЕРМИЧЕСКОЙ Однако наибольшую эффективность ГИВХ продемонстрировала у больных раком желудка с инвазией серозной оболочки, у которых данный метод применялся с целью профилактики развития перитонеальной диссеминации после радикального хирургического лечения. При лечении больных раком желудка с применением внутрибрюшной химиотерапии в различных исследованиях применялись разные классы химиопрепаратов и их сочетания.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call