Abstract

LUMINOUS OUTBURST OBSERVED ON THE SUN.—Comptes rendus for June 22 contains the information that on June 17, at 10h. 16m. Paris mean time, M. Trouvelot observed a luminous outburst on the sun, apparently of the same character as that witnessed by Carrington and Hodgson in 1859 (Monthly Notices R.A.S., vol. xx. pp. 13-16). A luminous spot subtending an angle of 3° appeared near the western limb of the sun (position-angle 281°). It had not the characteristic white colour of faculæ , but was yellowish, and strikingly resembled the light emitted by incandescent lamps shortly before they reach their maximum brilliancy. M. Trouvelot's first impression was that an opening at the eye-piece allowed a ubiquitous sunbeam to fall upon the screen upon which the sun's image was being projected, but an examination proved that the phenomenon was truly solar. In fact, shortly after the time of the first observation, a similar brilliant object subtending an angle of about 5°or 6° appeared slightly to the north of the first, its position-angle being about 289°. By means of spectroscopic observations it was found that the first object consisted of a central eruption from which a species of incandescent volcanic bombs were thrown to heights of 2′ or 3′ above the chromosphere, where they rested as if suspended, and appeared as dazzling globes on the red background on which they were projected. A few minutes later the sparkling balls were replaced by numerous brilliant filaments or jet, which at 10h. 24m. were shot out to height of 5′ 24″. In spite of the vivid light of this prominence only a few lines in the spectrum were seen to be reversed. In addition to the lines C, D3, F, and G, which were all extremely bright, the line at λ 6676˙8, the b group, and a line about λ 4394˙8, were seen bright. The sodium lines, D1 and D2, showed no indication of reversal. Considerable displacements of the C line towards both ends of the spectrum were observed. On the following day at 9h. 30m. the eruption was still very apparent, but diminishing in activity, and at 2h. 45m. all signs of an eruptive prominence had disappeared. The striking character of the outburst led M. Trouvelot to suggest that it might be accompanied by a simultaneous terrestrial magnetic perturbation. This was not the case, however, for after examining the records obtained at Kew Observatory, Mr. Whipple writes that there was not the slightest magnetic disturbance on the dates when the eruption was observed.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call