Abstract
Simone de Beauvoir’s The Ethics of Ambiguity is one of three sustained defences of existentialism which were offered in the 1940s.1 The remaining two defences were furnished by Maurice Merleau-Ponty and Jean-Paul Sartre. Merleau-Ponty’s defence is to be found chiefly in his essays The Battle over Existentialism’, Les Temps Modernes, No. 2, November 1945, ‘Metaphysics and the Novel’, Cahiers du Sud, No. 270, March 1945, and ‘A Scandalous Author’, Figaro Litteraire, 6 December 1947, but also, if to a less obvious extent, in the essays ‘The War Has Taken Place’, Les Temps Modernes, No. 1, October 1945, and The Metaphysical in Man’, Revue de metaphysique et de morale, Nos 3–4, July 1947. I shall now summarize the main lines of thought in these essays — from the general perspective of the defence of existentialism — before comparing Merleau-Ponty’s defence with that of Simone de Beauvoir.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
