Abstract

Fifteen minutes after injection there was a fall in mean heart rate (18%, p < 0.001), systolic blood pressure (10%, p < 0.001) and rate-pressure product (27%, p < 0.0001) in the metoprolol group of patients in the MIAMI trial. Hypotension and bradycardia not necessarily associated with withdrawal of drug were more common in the metoprolol group (p < 0.001). Atrioventricular block I was more common in the metoprolol group (p < 0.03), whereas no such difference was observed for atrioventricular block II and III, asystole or pacemaker implantations. Left ventricular failure was observed no more often in the metoprolol group. The occurrence of cardiogenic shock also did not differ between the groups. Cardiac glycosides were used more in the placebo group, but diuretic and furosemide usage did not differ. For all patients mean furosemide doses and number of diuretic injections were similar in both treatment groups. Atropine (4.1 vs 6.4%) and sympathomimetic (3.2 vs 4.6%) agents were used more often in the metoprolol group during days 0 to 5 (p < 0.05). The trial medication was withdrawn temporarily more often in the metoprolol than in the placebo group (p < 0.001). However, permanent withdrawal of trial medication occurred with a similar frequency overall in both groups. More patients were withdrawn from the study because of cardiovascular reasons in the metoprolol group (9%) than in the placebo group (5%, p < 0.001). Need for open treatment with a β blocker was more frequent in the placebo-treated patients (5 vs 2%, p < 0.001). A multivariate analysis indicated that tolerance to metoprolol treatment was not further impaired among patients with a high-mortality risk. Early intervention with metoprolol appeared to be well tolerated generally in these patients and no subgroups could be identified in which tolerability was markedly reduced.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call