Other climate-change inputs

Abstract

A vigorous round of correspondence appeared in Physics Today (October 2008, page 10) regarding the Opinion piece “Is Climate Sensitive to Solar Variability?” by Nicola Scafetta and Bruce West (Physics Today, March 2008, page 50). One letter writer, Peter Foukal, pointed out that neither total nor UV solar irradiance can account for most of the climate variance that correlates with solar activity. In view of the quantitative problems in using irradiance to account for the correlated climate variations, the question can be asked, Are the cosmic-ray variations, which are mostly due to solar activity, themselves drivers of climate change, or are they—as generally assumed—merely proxies for irradiance variations?Not mentioned in the discussion was observational evidence for greater long-term and short-term climate sensitivity to solar activity than irradiance can account for. Proxies for climate change on the centennial and millennial time scales—proxies such as glacier-carried debris and the oxygen-18 isotope—show strong correlations with the cosmic-ray-generated cosmogenic isotopes carbon-14 and beryllium-10 in stratified geological repositories. 1 1. G. Bond et al. , Science 294, 2130 (2001), and references therein. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1065680 One little-known mechanism coupling solar activity to the atmosphere has been shown to respond to cosmic-ray changes as well as to other inputs, as documented and reviewed in recent publications. 2 2. G. B. Burns et al. , J. Geophys. Res. 113, D15112 (2008), https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009618 , 3 3. B. A. Tinsley, Rep. Prog. Phys. 71, 066801 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1088/0034–4885/71/6/066801 Clear evidence of meteorological responses, including changes in cloud cover, has been reported for five disparate short-term solar or terrestrial inputs that modulate the flow of the downward electric current density Jz of the global electric circuit through the atmosphere. For example, recent analysis of measurements in both the Antarctic and Arctic high-magnetic-latitude regions shows correlations between surface pressure and the north–south component of the interplanetary electric field. Changes in Jz due to low-latitude thunderstorms produce a similar effect on polar surface pressure. 2 2. G. B. Burns et al. , J. Geophys. Res. 113, D15112 (2008), https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009618 There are other consistent, statistically significant atmospheric responses to the effects of cosmic-ray, solar-proton, and relativistic-electron precipitation on J z. 3 3. B. A. Tinsley, Rep. Prog. Phys. 71, 066801 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1088/0034–4885/71/6/066801 The Jz flow deposits electric charge on droplets and aerosol particles in gradients of droplet concentration, humidity, and, therefore, resistivity in clouds in accordance with Ohm’s law and Gauss’s law. Such charges could affect clouds through the scavenging rates for cloud-condensation and ice-forming nuclei. Consequent changes in the concentration of such nuclei and in ice-nucleation rates can affect droplet concentration, precipitation rate, and cloud cover and can potentially explain the observations. But to model the effects of the cloud changes on global mean temperature on the century time scale, it will be necessary to separately evaluate the effects of solar-induced Jz changes on clouds at low and high altitudes, at high and low latitudes, over ocean and land, by day and night, and for stratus versus cumulus clouds. Such work has not been done, but uncertainties appear much larger than those shown for the solar irradiance effect in the reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and can thus accommodate the observed changes in global temperature that correlate with solar activity. REFERENCESSection:ChooseTop of pageREFERENCES <<1. G. Bond et al. , Science 294, 2130 (2001), and references therein. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1065680 , Google ScholarCrossref2. G. B. Burns et al. , J. Geophys. Res. 113, D15112 (2008), https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009618 , Google ScholarCrossref3. B. A. Tinsley, Rep. Prog. Phys. 71, 066801 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1088/0034–4885/71/6/066801 , Google ScholarCrossref© 2009 American Institute of Physics.