Abstract

PurposeThe aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the treatment of traumatic periprosthetic femoral fractures with open reduction and internal fixation. The outcomes with the use of the surgical techniques were also reported.MethodsBetween September 2017 and September 2019, 25 patients with traumatic periprosthetic femoral fractures were managed by open reduction and internal fixation in Ain Shams University Hospital, Egypt. The fixation methods were selected based on the surgeon’s preference. Outcomes were assessed using the Harris Hip Score, visual analogue score (VAS) for pain, and EuroQol 5 Dimensions – 5 Level (EQ5D-5L) prior to and after surgery. Patients were regularly followed up for one year. A P value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.ResultsThe mean age at surgery was 77 years (range, 51 to 95 years), 64% (n = 16) were females. According to the Vancouver classification, there were 1 type AG, 15 type B1, and 9 type C fractures. Postoperative complications included wound site infection (n = 2) and non-union (n = 1). The mean pre-trauma Harris Hip Score was 77.44 ± 8.63 (range, 65 to 90), and the mean Harris Hip Score collected at the final follow-up was 72.47 ± 8.85 (range, 60 to 86) (P < 0.05). The mean pre-trauma VAS was 2.20 ± 1.21 (range, 0 to 4), and the mean VAS recorded at the final follow-up was 3.00 ± 1.41 (range, 0 to 5) (P < 0.05). According to the EQ5D-DL assessed at the final follow-up, no patient felt that their daily life and activities became more problematic.ConclusionThis study provided added validation of the current management of periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty. Using the proper fixation and implant can achieve a reliable fixation and good functional recovery.Level of evidenceIVa

Highlights

  • Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) are one of the complications after hip arthroplasties

  • The PFFs occurred at a mean time of 63 months after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA)

  • Non-union occurred in one patient and was treated by a revision surgery 36 months after fracture fixation because her concomitant chronic cardiovascular diseases precluded an early revision surgery

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) are one of the complications after hip arthroplasties. The reported incidences of PPF after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) ranged from 0.1 to 18% [1]. The treatments are based on the fracture characteristics, such as location, implant stability, fracture pattern, and quality of bone stock [5, 6]. Taha et al Arthroplasty (2021) 3:31 treatment options are available for PFFs. Non-operative treatments include traction or the use of a spica cast or cast brace [8]. The treatments are often associated with high rates of complications, such as prosthetic loosening, malunion, non-union, skin ulceration, deep venous thrombosis, and other medical problems [9]. Surgical strategies are selected based on those fracture characteristics [10]. Operations involve the minimally invasive procedures and conventional open reduction and internal fixation, with or without bone grafting [11, 12]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call