Abstract

Hip fractures are among the most frequently occurring fragility fractures in older adults, associated with a loss of quality of life, high mortality, and high use of healthcare resources. The aim was to apply the superlearner method to predict osteoporotic hip fractures using administrative claims data and to compare its performance to established methods. We devided claims data of 288,086 individuals aged 65 years and older without care level into a training (80%) and a validation set (20%). Subsequently, we trained a superlearner algorithm that considered both regression and machine learning algorithms (e.g., support vector machines, RUSBoost) on a large set of clinical risk factors. Mean squared error and measures of discrimination and calibration were employed to assess prediction performance. All algorithms used in the analysis showed similar performance with an AUC ranging from 0.66 to 0.72 in the training and 0.65 to 0.70 in the validation set. Superlearner showed good discrimination in the training set but poorer discrimination and calibration in the validation set. The superlearner achieved similar predictive performance compared to the individual algorithms included. Nevertheless, in the presence of non-linearity and complex interactions, this method might be a flexible alternative to be considered for risk prediction in large datasets.

Highlights

  • Hip fractures are among the most frequently occurring fragility fractures in older adults, associated with a loss of quality of life, high mortality, and high use of healthcare resources [1]

  • All algorithms used in the analysis showed similar performance with an area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) ranging from 0.66 to 0.72 in the training and 0.65 to 0.70 in the validation set

  • In order to fulfill the legal requirements to obtain that kind of data, researchers must conclude a contract with the SVLFG regarding data access

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Hip fractures are among the most frequently occurring fragility fractures in older adults, associated with a loss of quality of life, high mortality, and high use of healthcare resources [1]. Approaches to fracture risk assessment such as FRAX [4], Qfracture [5, 6] or the German DVO Tool [7] are well-established to predict osteoporotic fracture risk based on various (clinical) risk factors including e.g., increasing age, female gender, low body mass index, low bone mineral density (BMD), history of fragility fractures, history of falls, smoking, alcohol intake, glucocorticoid use, other causes of secondary osteoporosis [8] These tools rely on direct patient information to receive parameters relevant for risk prediction. These new techniques may have the potential to enhance risk prediction, thereby improving the chances of correctly identifying high-risk populations and offering interventions in a more efficient and targeted way

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.