Abstract

Simple SummaryIn the first two years following spinal cord injury, people lose up to 50% of bone below the injury. This injury-induced bone loss significantly affects rehabilitation and leaves people vulnerable to fractures and post-fracture complications, including lung and urinary tract infections, blood clots in the veins, and depression. Unfortunately, little is known about the factors driving this bone loss. In fact, even though we know that injury, age, and sex independently increase bone loss, there have been no studies looking at the cumulative effects of these variables. People with spinal injury are aging, and the age at which injuries occur is increasing. It is essential to know whether these factors together will further compromise bone. To examine this, we assessed bone loss in young and old, male and female mice after spinal injury. As expected, we found that aging alone decreased motor activity and bone volume. Spinal injury also reduced bone volume, but it did not worsen the effects of age. Instead, injury effects appeared related to reduced rearing activity. The data suggest that although partial weight-bearing does not reduce bone loss after spinal cord injury, therapies that put full weight on the legs may be clinically effective.After spinal cord injury (SCI), 80% of individuals are diagnosed with osteopenia or osteoporosis. The dramatic loss of bone after SCI increases the potential for fractures 100-fold, with post-fracture complications occurring in 54% of cases. With the age of new SCI injuries increasing, we hypothesized that a SCI-induced reduction in weight bearing could further exacerbate age-induced bone loss. To test this, young (2–3 months) and old (20–30 months) male and female mice were given a moderate spinal contusion injury (T9–T10), and recovery was assessed for 28 days (BMS, rearing counts, distance traveled). Tibial trabecular bone volume was measured after 28 days with ex vivo microCT. While BMS scores did not differ across groups, older subjects travelled less in the open field and there was a decrease in rearing with age and SCI. As expected, aging decreased trabecular bone volume and cortical thickness in both old male and female mice. SCI alone also reduced trabecular bone volume in young mice, but did not have an additional effect beyond the age-dependent decrease in trabecular and cortical bone volume seen in both sexes. Interestingly, both rearing and total activity correlated with decreased bone volume. These data underscore the importance of load and use on bone mass. While partial weight-bearing does not stabilize/reverse bone loss in humans, our data suggest that therapies that simulate complete loading may be effective after SCI.

Highlights

  • In the first two years following a spinal cord injury (SCI), there is a 30–50% decrease in bone mineral density in the lower limbs [1–4]

  • These data suggest that load and use may reduce bone loss after SCI, but that the effectiveness of physical therapy may be contingent on patient demographics

  • Rather than locomotor function per se, focusing on activities that place high compressive loads on the bone or increasing the duration of physical activity may be important for re-establishing bone formation after SCI. Supporting this premise, in the present study we found that increased tibial trabecular bone volume was associated with increased activity levels in an open field and increased rearing

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the first two years following a spinal cord injury (SCI), there is a 30–50% decrease in bone mineral density in the lower limbs [1–4]. More than 30% of adults living with SCI sustain fragility fractures of the lower extremities [11–16], an incidence two-fold greater than in the able-bodied population, with most fractures occurring during normal daily living activities (i.e., transferring to and from a wheelchair, dressing, and bathing [17]). These fractures compromise rehabilitation, they increase morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Bone loss after SCI significantly reduces a person’s quality of life and compromises physical well-being

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call