Abstract

There has yet to be a consensus among researchers, professionals, companies, regulatory agencies, and technical standards regarding the definition of osseointegration. The divergence is conceptual and occurs due to explanations of the mechanisms of interactions among cells and proteins with the implant. In medicine, osseointegration is assessed visually in radiographic examinations by the absence of implant-bone space or by mechanical stability and absence of pain. In the medical field, it is mentioned that there is osseointegration of cemented orthopedic prostheses, stainless steel prostheses, Co-Cr-Mo alloys, and zirconia. In dentistry, osseointegration occurs only with titanium implants and is characterized by bonding bone cells with the implant surface through proteins. Titanium implants are chemically, physically, and mechanically linked to the bone through proteins adhered to their surface without a fibrous connective tissue interface. The protein-titanium connection has mechanical strength and can withstand functional loads on dental implants. Given the divergences in the understanding of osseointegration of titanium and zirconia implants, concepts are presented that explain the differences in biocompatibility and applications of biomaterials, inflammatory processes, osseointegration, foreign body reaction, and the mechanisms of protein interactions with surfaces of titanium and zirconia implants.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.