Abstract

BackgroundOrthopaedic injury is the most common reason for lameness and wastage in sport and leisure horses. Studies on racehorses have shown differences in injury risk between trainers and training strategies. The aim was to study between riding school variation in orthopaedic health status by clinical examination and horses age, and control for change of examiner, in schools with previous high (n = 4) and low (n = 4) insurance utilisation.MethodsHorses (n = 99) at 8 riding schools were examined for conformation, movement in all gaits, standing flexion tests and palpation by two veterinary surgeons (in some schools only one). Indexes of findings were created for total health, movements, limbs, conformation and back palpation.ResultsLogistic regression analyses showed that findings increased with age (walk, trot, canter, conformation left hind limb, palpation fore limbs, hooves and flexion tests) or decreased with age (conformation right fore limb). Significant differences in findings were found between riding schools and examiner for seven and eight criteria each (partly overlapping). Increasing indexes were significantly associated with one examiner (total health, movements, back palpation), increasing age (total health, movements) or more time at the school (limbs). The back palpation index was highest at 5 < 8 years since acquisition.ConclusionThe age distribution differed markedly between riding schools and age affected several types of findings. This, combined with the two opposite groups of insurance use, shows that schools with low insurance utilisation had previously been able to "avoid" using the insurance, maybe even on similar types of cases if these were more promptly/differently handled indicating differential coverage of disease data in the insurance database. The examiner effect was clearly demonstrated. For some findings, the amount of clinical observations differed by school, even when examiner and age was adjusted for. Most findings were of minor importance, including slight movement irregularities. Orthopaedic status varies between riding schools. We hypothesize that this is associated with management factors that warrant further study.

Highlights

  • Lameness is the most common problem in equine veterinary practice [1,2,3]

  • The aim was to study between riding school variation in orthopaedic health status and horses age, by clinical examination in riding schools with previous high and low insurance utilisation

  • Further there was a linear increase of findings at trot on a straight line (fixed model OR 1.2, p = 0.006); (repeated model OR 1.1, p = 0.005) and palpation of fore limbs (repeated model OR 1.1, p < 0.0001). (For trot on a straight line there was an examiner effect, Table 3, and for palpation of fore limbs an examiner effect, Table 4)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Lameness is the most common problem in equine veterinary practice [1,2,3]. Studies of musculoskeletal injuries in Thoroughbred race horses have shown that the risk of injury is not distributed across the population, but varies with trainer and/or training regimens [4,5,6,7,8,9].Riding schools represent an important proportion of the horse industry, not least in Sweden, with students taking ~eight million lessons annually [10]. Studies of musculoskeletal injuries in Thoroughbred race horses have shown that the risk of injury is not distributed across the population, but varies with trainer and/or training regimens [4,5,6,7,8,9]. The aim was to study between riding school variation in orthopaedic health status and horses age, by clinical examination in riding schools with previous high and low insurance utilisation. Age/time variables, movement, conformation, clinical and orthopaedic status of horses, judged by experienced equine clinicians, were compared. Studies on racehorses have shown differences in injury risk between trainers and training strategies. The aim was to study between riding school variation in orthopaedic health status by clinical examination and horses age, and control for change of examiner, in schools with previous high (n = 4) and low (n = 4) insurance utilisation

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call