Abstract

Novel manipulations of the well-established multivariate calibration models namely; partial least square regression (PLSR) and support vector regression (SVR) are introduced in the presented comparative study. Two preprocessing methods comprising first derivatization and orthogonal projection to latent structures (OPLS) are implemented prior to modeling with PLSR and SVR. Quantitative determination of pyridostigmine bromide (PR) in existence of its two associated substances; impurity a (IMP A) and impurity b (IMP B); was utilized as a case study for achieving comparison. A series consisting of 16 mixtures with numerous percentages of the studied compounds was applied for implementation of a 3 factor 4 level experimental design. Additionally, a series consisting of 9 mixtures was employed in an independent test to verify the predictive power of the suggested models. Significant improvement of predictive abilities of the two studied chemometric models was attained via implementation of OPLS processing method. The root mean square error of prediction RMSEP for the test set mixtures was employed as a key comparison tool. About PLSR model, RMSEP was found 0.5283 without preprocessing method, 1.1750 when first derivative data was used and 0.2890 when OPLS preprocessing method was applied. With regard to SVR model, RMSEP was found 0.2173 without preprocessing method, 0.3516 when first derivative data was used and 0.1819 when OPLS preprocessing method was applied.

Highlights

  • Pyridostigmine bromide (PR) is chemically known as 3-[(dimethylcarbamoyl) oxy]-1- methylpyridinium bromide [1,2], Fig 1

  • principal component regression (PCR) and partial least square regression (PLSR) can deal with a large number of spectral variables via decomposing the X data into a relatively small numbers of what is known as the scores

  • The optimum number of PLS components chosen for establishing the calibration model for the training set to determine PR by bootstrap technique was 2 for PLSR, 4 for DPLSR and 3 for Orthogonal projection to latent structures (OPLS)-PLSR, Fig 3

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Pyridostigmine bromide (PR) is chemically known as 3-[(dimethylcarbamoyl) oxy]-1- methylpyridinium bromide [1,2], Fig 1. It is the best medication in case of the myasthenia gravis [3,4] due to its reversible choline esterase inhibition effect and parasympathomimetic effect [5]. Impurity A; Pyridin-3-yl-dimethylcarbamate (IMP A) and impurity B; 3-Hydroxy-Nmethylpyridinium bromide (IMP B) are the related substances of PR with reference to the British pharmacopeia BP [1]. They proved to be the main inactive metabolites of PR [23]. IMP B is its alkaline-induced degradation product [28]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call