Orthogonal external ventricular drain (EVD) trajectory from burr holes sited by junior neurosurgical staff is superior to freehand placement: An in-silico model

Abstract

External ventricular drain (EVD) or ventriculostomy placement is one of the most common neurosurgical procedures performed worldwide and is associated with complications including haemorrhage, malposition and infection. Several authors have attempted to define an ideal trajectory for placement, and scalp-mounted guidance devices have been devised to exploit the theoretical ideal orthogonal trajectory from the scalp to the lateral ventricles. However, uptake has been limited due to lack of demonstrated superiority to freehand placement. Previous modelling studies have failed to include a true-to-life sample of patients undergoing EVD insertion and excluded cases with midline shift or non-hydrocephalus indications. Further, none have attempted to model the orthogonal insertion of EVD via actual burr holes placed by junior neurosurgical staff. In our report of 58 cases of frontal EVD insertion in a low-volume Australian neurosurgical unit freehand EVD insertion resulted in acceptable placement in the ipsilateral frontal horn in 62% of cases, any ventricle in 22%, and in eloquent or non-eloquent brain in 16% of cases. The modelled orthogonal trajectory from the same burr holes, using post-procedural computed tomography scans and the S8 Stealth Station (Medtronic), resulted in superior placement; 80% in the ipsilateral frontal horn and 20% contralateral (p = 0.007). There were no significant malpositions associated with the modelled trajectories. In our series, 18% of freehand catheters required multiple placement attempts. In conclusion, our data suggests that an orthogonal trajectory may result in improved EVD positioning compared to freehand placement.