Abstract

Background Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a complex operation. Effective traction is crucial. We have successfully used an orthodontic rubber band (ORB) combined with the clip traction method to assist ESD (ORB-ESD). The aim of this retrospective study is to describe the method and to compare the efficacy and safety of ORB-ESD versus conventional ESD in the treatment of superficial colorectal tumors. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with superficial colorectal tumor (with diameter ≥ 20 mm) who received either ORB-ESD (n = 34) or conventional ESD (n = 90) between January 2019 and September 2020. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to match the clinical data of 31 pairs of patients in each group. Results Operation time was significantly shorter for ORB-ESD than for conventional ESD (34.5 minutes vs. 56 minutes, P ≤ 0.001). In the propensity-matched cohorts, the operation time remained significantly shorter in the ORB-ESD patients (35 minutes vs. 50 minutes, P = 0.001). Postoperative adverse events, en bloc resection rate, and R0 resection rate were comparable between the two groups (P > 0.05), both before and after propensity score matching. In the ORB subgroup analysis, the trainee and expert ESD operation times were similar (37 (26–53) vs. 33.5 (26–37) minutes, respectively; P = 0.274). Conclusion ORB-ESD appears to be an effective technique for ESD of colorectal cancer. Our findings need to be confirmed in large prospective multicenter studies.

Highlights

  • Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is widely used for the treatment of superficial gastrointestinal lesions

  • It should be noted that colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is complex, and traction methods that are effective in the esophagus and stomach may not be suitable for use in the colorectal tract

  • The aim of this study is to describe the technique and to retrospectively compare the efficacy and safety of orthodontic rubber band (ORB)-ESD versus conventional ESD in the treatment of colorectal tumors

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is widely used for the treatment of superficial gastrointestinal lesions. The search continues for a simple, economical, safe, and effective traction method for use during colorectal ESD. Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a complex operation. We have successfully used an orthodontic rubber band (ORB) combined with the clip traction method to assist ESD (ORB-ESD). The aim of this retrospective study is to describe the method and to compare the efficacy and safety of ORB-ESD versus conventional ESD in the treatment of superficial colorectal tumors. Operation time was significantly shorter for ORB-ESD than for conventional ESD (34.5 minutes vs 56 minutes, P ≤ 0:001). In the propensity-matched cohorts, the operation time remained significantly shorter in the ORB-ESD patients (35 minutes vs 50 minutes, P = 0:001). Our findings need to be confirmed in large prospective multicenter studies

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call