Origins of Conformational Heterogeneity in Peptoid Helices Formed by Chiral N-1-Phenylethyl Sidechains.

Abstract

N-substituted glycines (polypeptoids) containing chiral hydrophobic sidechains are known to fold into biomimetic alpha helices. These helix formers often produce conformationally heterogeneous structures and are difficult to characterize at a sub-nanometer resolution. Previously, peptoid N-1-phenylethyl (S)-enantiomer sidechains (Nspe) were inferred from various experiments to form right-handed helices and (R)-enantiomers (Nrpe), left-handed helices. Prior computational work for N(s/r)pe oligomers has struggled to reproduce this trend. Herein, quantum mechanics calculations and molecular dynamics simulations are used to understand the origins of this discrepancy. Results from DFT and molecular mechanics calculations on a variety of Nspe and Nrpe oligomers as a function of chain length are in agreement, showing that Nspe and Nrpe prefer left- and right-handed helices, respectively. Additional metadynamics simulations are used to study Nrpe and Nspe oligomers folding in water. These results show that the free-energy driving forces for assembly into a helical backbone configuration are very small (within ∼kBT). Lastly, we compare DFT calculations for other experimentally characterized peptoid sidechains, N(r/s)sb, N(r/s)tbe, and N(r/s)npe. In this analysis, we show that peptoid sidechains determined to be more robust experimentally (tbe and npe) have helical preferences opposite the trend seen in less robust assemblies formed by N(r/s)pe and N(r/s)sb chemistries. The more robust tbe and nnpe favor the (S)-enantiomer to right-handed and the (R)-enantiomers to left-handed helices.