Abstract
We report major, trace, and volatile element data on basaltic glasses from the northernmost segment of the Eastern Lau Spreading Center (ELSC1) in the Lau back‐arc basin to further test and constrain models of back‐arc volcanism. The zero‐age samples come from 47 precisely collected stations from an 85 km length spreading center. The chemical data covary similarly to other back‐arc systems but with tighter correlations and well‐developed spatial systematics. We confirm a correlation between volatile content and apparent extent of melting of the mantle source but also show that the data cannot be reproduced by the model of isobaric addition of water that has been broadly applied to back‐arc basins. The new data also confirm that there is no relationship between mantle temperature and the wet melting productivity. Two distinct magmatic provinces can be identified along the ELSC1 axis, a southern province influenced by a “wet component” with strong affinities to arc volcanism and a northern province influenced by a “damp component” intermediate between enriched mid‐ocean ridge basalts (E‐MORB) and arc basalts. High–field strength elements and rare earth elements are all mobilized to some extent by the wet component, and the detailed composition of this component is determined. It differs in significant ways from the Mariana component reported by E. Stolper and S. Newman (1994), particularly by having lower abundances of most elements relative to H2O. The differences can be explained if the slab temperature is higher for the Mariana and the source from which the fluid is derived is more enriched. The ELSC1 damp component is best explained by mixing between the wet component and an E‐MORB‐like component. We propose that mixing between water‐rich fluids and low‐degree silicate melts occurs at depth in the subduction zone to generate the chemical diversity of the ELSC1 subduction components. These modified sources then rise independently to the surface and melt, and these melts mix with melts of the background mantle from the ridge melting regime to generate the linear data arrays characteristic of back‐arc basalts. The major and trace element framework for ELSC1, combined with different slab temperatures and compositions for difference convergent margins, may be able to be applied to other back‐arc basins around the globe.
Highlights
MantleH2Oa Cl K2O Na2O TiO2 Tl Cs Rb Ba Th U Nb Ta La Ce Pb Pr Sr Nd Zr Hf Sm Gd Tb Dy Ho Y Er Yb Lu aWater content fixed arbitrary to calculate all other elements.[Elliott et al, 1997; Miller et al, 1994]
The island arc basalts (IAB) signature in back-arc basin basalts (BABB) results from the addition to the back-arc source of a component rich in water and largeion lithophile elements (LILE), derived from the subducting slab, and this component generates an array of sources that melt proportionately to their water content to generate backarc basalts
For all values of source concentration for Nb, the results show a characteristic shape of relative values of distribution coefficients, with inverted Ds for light rare earth element (REE) higher than D’s for the heavy REE (HREE), and a general negative slope of partition coefficient values when plotted in standard order of incompatibility
Summary
The IAB signature in BABB results from the addition to the back-arc source of a component rich in water and largeion lithophile elements (LILE), derived from the subducting slab, and this component generates an array of sources that melt proportionately to their water content to generate backarc basalts This added component contains no high – field strength elements (i.e., Ti, Nb, Ta, Zr, and Hf) [e.g., Gill, 1981; Stolper and Newman, 1994]. Sampling was guided by prior survey data from [Martinez et al, 2006], including both ship-based multibeam bathymetry that encompassed the entire ridge axis and surrounding regions and higher-resolution DSL-120 bathymetry and side scan sonar Together these data provided precise knowledge of the neovolcanic zone and allowed recognition of the areas with the youngest flows. Forty-six targets were sampled along this segment with an average spacing of about 3 km and higher density locally near the newly discovered Kilo Moana hydrothermal vent field that occurs in the southern portions of this segment at 20°030S [Edmonds et al, 2004]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.