Abstract

Warming occurs in the Arctic twice as fast as the global average, which in turn leads to a large enhancement in terpenoid emissions from vegetation. Volatile terpenoids are the main class of biogenic volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that play crucial roles in atmospheric chemistry and climate. However, the biochemical mechanisms behind the temperature‐dependent increase in VOC emissions from subarctic ecosystems are largely unexplored. Using 13CO2‐labeling, we studied the origin of VOCs and the carbon (C) allocation under global warming in the soil–plant–atmosphere system of contrasting subarctic heath tundra vegetation communities characterized by dwarf shrubs of the genera Salix or Betula. The projected temperature rise of the subarctic summer by 5°C was realistically simulated in sophisticated climate chambers. VOC emissions strongly depended on the plant species composition of the heath tundra. Warming caused increased VOC emissions and significant changes in the pattern of volatiles toward more reactive hydrocarbons. The 13C was incorporated to varying degrees in different monoterpene and sesquiterpene isomers. We found that de novo monoterpene biosynthesis contributed to 40%–44% (Salix) and 60%–68% (Betula) of total monoterpene emissions under the current climate, and that warming increased the contribution to 50%–58% (Salix) and 87%–95% (Betula). Analyses of above‐ and belowground 12/13C showed shifts of C allocation in the plant–soil systems and negative effects of warming on C sequestration by lowering net ecosystem exchange of CO2 and increasing C loss as VOCs. This comprehensive analysis provides the scientific basis for mechanistically understanding the processes controlling terpenoid emissions, required for modeling VOC emissions from terrestrial ecosystems and predicting the future chemistry of the arctic atmosphere. By changing the chemical composition and loads of VOCs into the atmosphere, the current data indicate that global warming in the Arctic may have implications for regional and global climate and for the delicate tundra ecosystems.

Highlights

  • In the Arctic, a temperature increase of 1°C per decade has been measured for the last 30 years (IPCC, 2013), which is twice the increment relative to the global average

  • Using 13CO2-labeling, we studied the origin of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and the carbon (C) allocation under global warming in the soil–plant–atmosphere system of contrasting subarctic heath tundra vegetation communities characterized by dwarf shrubs of the genera Salix or Betula

  • We found that de novo monoterpene biosynthesis contributed to 40%–44% (Salix) and 60%–68% (Betula) of total monoterpene emissions under the current climate, and that warming increased the contribution to 50%–58% (Salix) and 87%–95% (Betula)

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

In the Arctic, a temperature increase of 1°C per decade has been measured for the last 30 years (IPCC, 2013), which is twice the increment relative to the global average. Global warming already impacts plant productivity and biomass allocation, plant species distribution (Elmendorf et al, 2012), soil properties (Rinnan, Michelsen, Bååth, & Jonasson, 2007), precipitation patterns (Callaghan et al, 2011), and emissions of biogenic volatile organic compounds (VOCs; Rinnan, Steinke, McGenity, & Loreto, 2014). To model terpenoid emissions from the Subarctic during the rapidly proceeding warming, it is paramount to study the processes controlling the emissions and quantify to what extent future increasing temperatures enhance de novo biosynthesis and the evaporation rate of volatile emissions from storage pools. Using 13CO2-labeling technique and this chamber system, we deciphered and quantified the “de novo” and the “pool” parts from the total terpenoid emissions (Ghirardo et al, 2010; Harley, Eller, Guenther, & Monson, 2014) under simulated actual and predicted future (IPCC, 2013) summer temperatures of the subarctic regions. By tracing the airborne 13C within the mesocosms, this study reveals the differential carbon allocation patterns of plant species above- and belowground

| MATERIALS AND METHODS
| Experimental setup and climate simulation
Findings
| DISCUSSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.