Abstract

The descent of Spartan kings from Heracles is considered to be the secondary myth interpretation about the “Return of the Heracledae”. It was associated with Dorian conquest of the Peloponnese in the ancient tradition (Tyrtaeus, Pindar, Herodotus, Isocrates, Ephor). The myth of the “Return of the Heracledae” is known to be one of the genealogical fiction what was invented in Argos and developed further in Sparta. There was a powerful argument for inheritance the rights of the royal title and performing the functions of the high priest in the community if the person was known as the descendant of Heracles belonging to the royal dynasties (Agiades and Euripontides). Apart from that, the power of Spartan kings outside Sparta could be justified if they were related to Heracles. In addition, this belonging to the descendants of Heraclides was above everything. It was one of the most important propaganda arguments to substantiate the legitimacy of the possession of conquered lands in Laconia and Messenia and provide “pro-Achaean” policy by the authorities of Sparta. However, the image of Heracles and his cult did not have the essential meaning in the religious life of the Spartan polis. The heavenly patrons of the kings were “divine twins” - the Dioscuri (Tindaridae). To conclude, it seems to be very controversial that the philosophical and ethical image of Heracles (as the main cynic hero) had a great influence on the representatives of the royal diarchy of the late classical and hellenistic periods.

Highlights

  • Существование царской власти в Спарте, в отличие от остальных полисов Древней Греции, никогда не было поставлено под сомнение

  • Сообщения Пиндара имеют различия с аналогичными сведениями Тиртея о происхождении спартанских басилеев

  • Происхождение от Геракла являлось непременным условием при восхождении на престол, так как спартанские цари должны были быть только Гераклидами

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Существование царской власти в Спарте, в отличие от остальных полисов Древней Греции, никогда не было поставлено под сомнение. Что версия Геродота о приходе дорийцев в Пелопоннес существенно отличается от версий Тиртея, Пиндара и Фукидида (Thuc., I, 12, 3), она также содержит в себе элементы предания о возвращении Герклидов и, соответственно, происхождении спартанских царей из рода Геракла. Она стала первостепенным источником для детальных сообщений о возвращении Гераклидов, которые можно найти в более поздних компиляциях времен Империи, таких как «Историческая библиотека» Диодора (Diod., IV, 33, 5; 37, 3–4; 57–58), «Мифологическая библиотека» Аполлодора (Apollodorus II, 7, 3; II, 8) и «Описание Эллады» Павсания (Paus., II, 18, 7–9; III, 1, 5–6; IV, 3, 5–7; 4, l–4; VIII, 5, 1).

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.