Abstract

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to compare the clinical characteristics and short-term mortality of patients with abdominal and pulmonary sepsis.DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingAdult intensive care units (ICUs) at tertiary hospitals.ParticipantsAdult ICU patients from 2014 to 2015 in the eICU Collaborative Research Database.InterventionsIn univariate analysis, we compared the differences in the characteristics of patients in each group. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate the relationships between primary site of sepsis and short-term prognosis.Primary and Secondary Outcome MeasuresHospital and ICU survival.ResultsThe final dataset included 7023 pulmonary and 2360 abdominal sepsis patients, who accounted for 74.84% and 25.16%, respectively. We compared the results of the baseline characteristics, vital signs and laboratory indicators between the two groups. In the logistic regression models, we found that the hospital and ICU mortality of patients with abdominal sepsis was higher than that with pulmonary sepsis (p < 0.05, OR = 1.15, p < 0.05, OR = 1.19, respectively), although these results were no longer significantly after adjustment for confounders, but in the subgroups with SOFA score ≧ 8, the adjusted hospital mortality rate of patients with abdominal sepsis was 1.30 times higher than that of patients with pulmonary sepsis (p < 0.005, OR = 1.30, 95% CI 1.09–1.55), while there was no significant difference in the subgroups that SOFA score < 8.ConclusionIn the patients with SOFA score ≧ 8, the adjusted hospital mortality of patients with abdominal sepsis was higher than patients with pulmonary sepsis.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.