Abstract

Bioethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass is still struggling with many obstacles. One of them is lignocellulosic inhibitors. The aim of this review is to discuss the most known inhibitors. Additionally, the review addresses different detoxification methods to degrade or to remove inhibitors from lignocellulosic hydrolysates. Inhibitors are formed during the pretreatment of biomass. They derive from the structural polymers-cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. The formation of inhibitors depends on the pretreatment conditions. Inhibitors can have a negative influence on both the enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. The inhibition mechanisms can be, for example, deactivation of enzymes or impairment of vital cell structures. The toxicity of each inhibitor depends on its chemical and physical properties. To decrease the negative effects of inhibitors, different detoxification methods have been researched. Those methods focus on the chemical modification of inhibitors into less toxic forms or on the separation of inhibitors from lignocellulosic hydrolysates. Each detoxification method has its limitations on the removal of certain inhibitors. To choose a suitable detoxification method, a deep molecular understanding of the inhibition mechanism and the inhibitor formation is necessary.

Highlights

  • The 2nd generation bioethanol is produced from lignocellulosic biomass, like straw or wood.This kind of biomass does not compete with the food or feed industry and mitigates the fuel-vs.-food debate, which is often discussed in case of the 1st generation bioethanol production from edible crops [1]

  • Pretreatment loosens the tight matrix of the structural polymers in the lignocellulosic biomass and the increased surface area enables a better enzymatic hydrolysis of the polysaccharides

  • It clear is clear that lignocellulosic inhibitors have a negative effect bioethanol production from

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The 2nd generation bioethanol is produced from lignocellulosic biomass, like straw or wood This kind of biomass does not compete with the food or feed industry and mitigates the fuel-vs.-food debate, which is often discussed in case of the 1st generation bioethanol production from edible crops [1]. Pretreatment loosens the tight matrix of the structural polymers in the lignocellulosic biomass and the increased surface area enables a better enzymatic hydrolysis of the polysaccharides. The sugars from those two polymers can be used for producing bioethanol [2,3]

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call