Abstract
In 2013 the Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) was amended in order to include the new ground of ‘sexual orientation’. This amendment was specifically intended to extend federal anti-discrimination protections to cover gay men, lesbian women and bisexual people for the first time. However, in the case of Bunning v Centacare (2015) 293 FLR 37 the Federal Circuit Court was asked to decide whether, as a matter of law, polyamory constituted a ‘sexual orientation’ under this new ground. This case highlights the questions that a number of academic commentators have raised in recent years about whether anti-discrimination protections around sexuality should cover a broader scope than simply homosexuality, bisexuality and heterosexuality. Drawing on this recent commentary and these new federal legal developments, this article critically analyses the problematic way in which anti-discrimination laws differentially protect some types of sexuality and not others. This article argues that such laws should cover a broader range of sexuality, including minority sexualities such as polyamory, asexuality, and sadomasochism.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.