Abstract

AbstractWe present here the syntheses, crystal structures, and spin crossover (SCO) properties of a series of halogen‐functionalized cobalt(II) complexes, [Co(Brphtpy)2](OTf)2 ⋅ DMF ⋅ 2H2O (1), [Co(Brphtpy)2](HBS)2 ⋅ H2O (2), [Co(Brphtpy)2](MQ)2 ⋅ 2MeCN ⋅ 3H2O (3) (Brphtpy=4′–(4‐Bromophenyl)–2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine; OTf−=trifluoromethanesulfonate; HBS−=hydroxybenzenesulfonate dihydrate; MQ−=methyl orange). Variable‐temperature single‐crystal X‐ray analyses revealed mononuclear compounds of 1–3 consisted of [Co(Brphtpy)2]2+ SCO active units and organosulfonate anions and no structural phase transformation happened in measured high‐low temperature. The packing structures of these complexes were tuned by varying organosulfonates. However, no notable supramolecular interactions can be found, in turn leading to gradual, incomplete, and non‐hysteretic SCO behaviors. Interestingly, the SCO behaviors of these three complexes were significantly modified after the removal of lattice solvents. Combined structural and magnetic investigations revealed the non‐cooperative supramolecular packing structures, guest internal pressure, and the small structural distortions of the SCO units should be responsible for the worse SCO properties of 1–3. The foregoing results show that to achieve high‐performance Co2+ SCO, both the weak interactions, internal pressure, and structural distortion should be considered during the design and construction of SCO complexes.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.