Abstract

Purpose of the study: to evaluate the organoprotective effects of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and intra-aortic balloon pump during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndrome.Materials and methods. Patients required mechanical circulatory support (n=51) were divided into two study groups: patients who received mechanical circulatory support by veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (Group 1, n=29) during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention, and Group 2 patients who received mechanical circulatory support by intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (Group 2, n=22). The dynamics of instrumental parameters and laboratory markers of organ damage were evaluated by electrocardiography, echocardiography, determining troponin I, creatine phosphokinases and creatinine levels, NGAL, venous blood saturation to compare the organoprotective properties of mechanical circulation support in the intra- and postoperative period.Results. The following values of the parameters were found the next day after the intervention: troponin I — 0.18 (0.1; 2.3) ng/ml in the ECMO group and 1.64 (0.92; 2.36) ng/ml in the IABP group (P=0.045); serum NGAL —139.4 (88.1; 166.7) ng/ml in the ECMO group and 212.3 (102; 279) in the IABP group (P=0.027); renal dysfunction (stages R, I, F according to RIFLE) — 2 (6.8%) observations in the ECMO group and 7 (31.8%) in the IABP group (P=0.021); multiple organ failure (2 or more points according to SOFA) — 3 (10.3%) cases in the ECMO group and 12 (54.5%) in the IABP group (P=0.001).Conclusion. Veno-arterial ECMO in comparison with IABP has a more pronounced organoprotective effect by achieving better hemodynamic stability, which, in turn, prevents hypoxia and the subsequent development of organ dysfunction. In addition, in conditions of veno-arterial ECMO, better completeness and quality of revascularization is ensured, and hospital mortality is also reduced.

Highlights

  • Чрескожное коронарное вмешательство высокого риска (ЧКВ ВР) — это собирательный термин, объединяющий под собой целую группу факторов, наличие или сочетание которых определяют высокий риск технических и гемодинамических осложнений чрескожной реваскуляризации

  • The following values of the parameters were found the day after the intervention: troponin I — 0.18 (0.1; 2.3) ng/ml in the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) group and 1.64 (0.92; 2.36) ng/ml in the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) group (P=0.045); serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) —139.4 (88.1; 166.7) ng/ml in the ECMO group and 212.3 (102; 279) in the IABP group (P=0.027); renal dysfunction — 2 (6.8%) observations in the ECMO group and 7 (31.8%) in the IABP group (P=0.021); multiple organ failure (2 or more points according to SOFA) — 3 (10.3%) cases in the ECMO group and 12 (54.5%) in the IABP group (P=0.001)

  • The aim of the study was to evaluate the organoprotective effects of VA ECMO and IABP during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Чрескожное коронарное вмешательство высокого риска (ЧКВ ВР) — это собирательный термин, объединяющий под собой целую группу факторов, наличие или сочетание которых определяют высокий риск технических и гемодинамических осложнений чрескожной реваскуляризации. При этом оптимальная тактика реваскуляризации является предметом дискуссии, и при многососудистом поражении КА предпочтение отдается операции коронарного шунтирования [3]. Когда в операции коронарного шунтирования может быть отказано на основании высокого риска по шкале STS или EuroScore II. Определяющими риск, являются острый коронарный синдром (ОКС), низкая фракция выброса левого желудочка (ФВ ЛЖ), коморбидный фон, ожирение, высокий риск геморрагических осложнений на фоне двойной антиагрегантной терапии [4, 5]. Консервативная тактика в случае отказа от реваскуляризации при ОКС сопровождается высокой (28%) госпитальной летальностью

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call