Abstract

In this study, the concentrations of organophosphate flame retardants (OPFR) and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) were investigated in raw water and treated water samples obtained from 18 drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs). The ∑13OPFR concentrations in the treated water samples (29.5–122 ng/L; median 47.5 ng/L) were lower than those in the raw water (37.7–231 ng/L; median 98.1 ng/L), which indicated the positive removal rates (0–80%) of ∑13OPFR in the DWTPs. The removal efficiencies of ∑27PFAS in the DWTPs ranged from −200% to 50%, with the ∑27PFAS concentrations in the raw water (4.15–154 ng/L; median 32.0 ng/L) being similar to or lower than those in the treated water (4.74–116 ng/L; median 42.2 ng/L). Among OPFR, tris(chloroisopropyl) phosphate (TCIPP) and tris(2-chloroethyl) phosphate (TCEP) were dominant in both raw water and treated water samples obtained from the DWTPs. The dominant PFAS (perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA)) in the raw water samples were slightly different from those in the treated water samples (PFOA, L-perfluorohexane sulfonate (L-PFHxS), and PFHxA). The 95-percentile daily intakes of ∑13OPFR and ∑27PFAS via drinking water consumption were estimated to be up to 4.9 ng/kg/d and 0.22 ng/kg/d, respectively. The hazard index values of OPFR and PFAS were lower than 1, suggesting the risks less than known hazardous levels.

Highlights

  • Organophosphate flame retardants (OPFR) and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)are used widely in various industrial and commercial applications [1,2,3]

  • Two OPFR (tripropyl phosphate (TPrP) and diphenyl cresyl phosphate (DCP)) and ten PFAS (perfluoropentane sulfonate (PFPeS), perfluorononane sulfonate (L-PFNS), five precursors, and three alternatives) were first reported in both raw water and treated water samples obtained from the drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs) in South

  • This study indicated the PFAS removal patterns in DWTPs were similar to those reported by Kim et al (2020) [28]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Organophosphate flame retardants (OPFR) and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)are used widely in various industrial and commercial applications [1,2,3]. Organophosphate flame retardants (OPFR) and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Because OPFR are considered alternatives to halogenated flame retardants, their share has increased to. 20% of the total use of flame retardants in Europe [4]. PFAS can offer resistance against water, oil, and soil owing to their structures with both hydrophobic and hydrophilic functional groups [5]. They are used as surface protectors and surfactants of carpets, leathers, textiles, papers, and fire extinguishing agents. PFAS have been classified as potentially carcinogenic substances by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Organization for Economic

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call