Abstract
The author discusses the extent to which the notion of relational distance can improve the understanding that scholars in economic geography and organization science have of the spatiality of innovation processes. He specifies relational distance as a multidimensional notion that can best guide empirical analysis when used in a heuristic manner. It becomes consequential when instantiated in interpersonal interaction. Furthermore, relational distance is always situated in practice and is thus intertwined with physical space. An ethnographic case study of developmental knowledge practices of a high-tech, biosensor measuring device is analyzed. The struggle that the participating researchers have with two competing role expectations (scientist and product developer) is interpreted as an expression of relational distance. Experimental and interaction practices characteristic of both role expectations are contrasted in order to identify time-spatial tensions (conflicts of dislocation, allocation, and mobility-related opportunity costs) that occur when divergent knowledge practices overlap.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
