Abstract
Research on organizational illegality coming from several disciplines converges on three central explanatory variables; environment (pressure, need, or distress); structure (corporate, industrial, or legal); and inner-directed choice processes (pathology, intent, or proactive exploitation). This paper briefly uses such a framework to identify and categorize a few of the theories of organizational illegality. A research strategy is then presented using the instances of prosecution for misrepresentation (deceptive advertising) as an example.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
