Abstract

Expectations from higher education institutions and systems are constantly increasing at both national and global levels. In addition to the variety of services provided by higher education institutions, the rise in expectations makes management of these institutions more difficult. However, while formations such as mission differentiation, thematic university structure, and regional development universities differentiate the objectives of higher education institutions from each other, attempts to achieve these specific objectives may bring along an organizational and informal structure specific to the institution. Based on this premise, the aim of this study is to examine the institution-specific governance models observed in Turkish higher education institutions. This case study is based on the five models of organizational functioning introduced by Birnbaum with the perspective of new institutionalism. The data of the study were obtained from two sources: Existing literature and interviews with 10 academics from higher education institutions. Accordingly, the governance models frequently observed in Turkish higher education institutions are bureaucratic model, political model and organized anarchy. In addition, the rapid increase in the number of higher education institutions and the dependence on resources increase the homogeneity between higher education institutions.

Highlights

  • The scope and number of studies in the field of higher education is constantly increasing

  • The aim of this study is to examine the institutional governance models observed in higher education institutions in Turkey within the aforementioned framework

  • It is examined how the institutional governance observed in the Turkish higher education system functions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The scope and number of studies in the field of higher education is constantly increasing. In addition to the economic benefits of transforming into an information society, social equality and mobility and ensuring social cohesion are of critical importance for individuals on both national and global scales. Higher education currently provides an institutional basis for all academic disciplines (Brennan & Teichler, 2008). Examination of higher education and higher education governance includes many organizational and structural factors. The rapid increase in the number of expectations and beneficiaries from higher education and the transition to the information society necessitated an original and autonomous functioning in higher education. Hatice Ergin Kocatürk, PhD, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Hasan Ali Yücel Faculty of Education, 34500 Büyükçekmece/İstanbul, Turkey. Organizational functioning in Turkish higher education system: Birnbaum’s five models of institutional governance.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call